Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Machinery
Machinery
New Holland dynamic command
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard98" data-source="post: 6640050" data-attributes="member: 45608"><p>Yes, it's better on fuel than anything else we've got. I haven't done any scientific tests but the mf 6270 that used to do the ploughing and is now the backup has a 225l tank and would just about do 2 days to a tank on the 4 furrow plough and press, the NH has a 230l tank and will do 3 days. the 6270 at 120hp would be running approx 1850 rpm and the plough is a good load for it whereas the new holland at 145 hardly knows its got it behind and marches along at about 1500 all day. Similar story with the 3m combination drill, the mf 6265 that used to run it was on its knees and would drain its 160l tank in a good day. the NH runs it in eco pto quite happily without the engine lugging and will do close to 3 days to a tank. adblue does need to be factored in, the tractor has done around 300 hours and just emptied the first 210l drum. not sure if this is typical for adblue usage?</p><p> the fuel economy we're getting could in part be because the tractor is never working that hard yet and plays with all our current implements whereas the masseys have had a matched load in the 6270's case or been on its knees like the 6265. in time we will get a 5 furrow plough and bigger subsoiler etc to make use of the power. I reckon that a tractor with a little power to spare is more efficient than a smaller one on its limits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard98, post: 6640050, member: 45608"] Yes, it's better on fuel than anything else we've got. I haven't done any scientific tests but the mf 6270 that used to do the ploughing and is now the backup has a 225l tank and would just about do 2 days to a tank on the 4 furrow plough and press, the NH has a 230l tank and will do 3 days. the 6270 at 120hp would be running approx 1850 rpm and the plough is a good load for it whereas the new holland at 145 hardly knows its got it behind and marches along at about 1500 all day. Similar story with the 3m combination drill, the mf 6265 that used to run it was on its knees and would drain its 160l tank in a good day. the NH runs it in eco pto quite happily without the engine lugging and will do close to 3 days to a tank. adblue does need to be factored in, the tractor has done around 300 hours and just emptied the first 210l drum. not sure if this is typical for adblue usage? the fuel economy we're getting could in part be because the tractor is never working that hard yet and plays with all our current implements whereas the masseys have had a matched load in the 6270's case or been on its knees like the 6265. in time we will get a 5 furrow plough and bigger subsoiler etc to make use of the power. I reckon that a tractor with a little power to spare is more efficient than a smaller one on its limits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Machinery
Machinery
New Holland dynamic command
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top