Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Building and Infrastructure
Buildings & Infrastructure
Planning Applications, PD and the like (General Chat)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kidds" data-source="post: 9149230" data-attributes="member: 5589"><p>A hypothetical question for you [USER=16346]@George from SJM Planning[/USER] but it does relate to a friends application.</p><p>Application was refused for various reasons but the main one was:</p><p> The proposed development fails to meet the requirements of, and conflicts with, Policy STRAT 9 of the Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan (Part One) and Policy DM 22 of the Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan (Part Two). (opposed to new development in the countryside)</p><p>The development would also cause detrimental harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside.</p><p>I have no idea how it would cause harm as it is isolated and very few spots where you could actually see it, and even then it is just a derelict farmyard by all appearances at the moment.</p><p>My question is, would it be feasible to apply under class Q for part of it and avoid those conflicts, then once passed get it changed to full planning without doing any work. Then assuming that is passed go on to use class Q to get the other half passed? Is that a way of using the easier route of converting a farm yard and getting around the size limitations of class Q?</p><p></p><p>As I say, just theoretical, nothing to do with me just interested as I have known the family and farm all my life. It's not for me to advise them as they are the typical bunch of sibling farmers that cannot come to any agreement amongst themselves and I have no intention of getting involved in that lot much as I very much like all of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kidds, post: 9149230, member: 5589"] A hypothetical question for you [USER=16346]@George from SJM Planning[/USER] but it does relate to a friends application. Application was refused for various reasons but the main one was: The proposed development fails to meet the requirements of, and conflicts with, Policy STRAT 9 of the Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan (Part One) and Policy DM 22 of the Cheshire West and Chester Local Plan (Part Two). (opposed to new development in the countryside) The development would also cause detrimental harm to the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside. I have no idea how it would cause harm as it is isolated and very few spots where you could actually see it, and even then it is just a derelict farmyard by all appearances at the moment. My question is, would it be feasible to apply under class Q for part of it and avoid those conflicts, then once passed get it changed to full planning without doing any work. Then assuming that is passed go on to use class Q to get the other half passed? Is that a way of using the easier route of converting a farm yard and getting around the size limitations of class Q? As I say, just theoretical, nothing to do with me just interested as I have known the family and farm all my life. It's not for me to advise them as they are the typical bunch of sibling farmers that cannot come to any agreement amongst themselves and I have no intention of getting involved in that lot much as I very much like all of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Building and Infrastructure
Buildings & Infrastructure
Planning Applications, PD and the like (General Chat)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top