Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Red tractor stakeholder survey on governance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="onesiedale" data-source="post: 9174256" data-attributes="member: 13510"><p>Thoughts on that email ^^</p><p></p><p><em>“It also flags that ‘Red Tractor is perhaps significantly more transparent than other assurance schemes’ ...</em></p><p><strong>But doesn't say what the other assurance schemes are </strong></p><p></p><p><em>“We now have an essential opportunity to reflect and refresh the way Red Tractor delivers"...</em></p><p><strong>Can someone define an essential opportunity please? </strong></p><p></p><p>: <em>“…a process was agreed which included customer surveys, piloting with 40 farming enterprises, a cost-benefit analysis, updates to all Sector Boards, and regular OB and Board updates. Some 300 + stakeholders were involved in this process, including the NFU, which was duly briefed at formal meetings during the process.” </em></p><p><strong>This doesn't sound right, it sounds made up, I would even go so far as to say a lie. This needs to be transparent. </strong></p><p><strong>Who has actually seen, or been involved in any of this? That list of people above would amount to more than 1000. Statistically that in itself is so significant that it is nothing short of a miracle that nobody else has mentioned it.</strong></p><p></p><p><em>" Address stakeholder engagement and relations as a priority:...We understand that Red Tractor intends to commit resource and time to engaging with farmers in coming months, "</em></p><p><strong>It's strange that now, after the report, farmers suddenly become stakeholders. This is probably the single biggest admission of the contempt that farmers have been treated with.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="onesiedale, post: 9174256, member: 13510"] Thoughts on that email ^^ [I]“It also flags that ‘Red Tractor is perhaps significantly more transparent than other assurance schemes’ ...[/I] [B]But doesn't say what the other assurance schemes are [/B] [I]“We now have an essential opportunity to reflect and refresh the way Red Tractor delivers"...[/I] [B]Can someone define an essential opportunity please? [/B] : [I]“…a process was agreed which included customer surveys, piloting with 40 farming enterprises, a cost-benefit analysis, updates to all Sector Boards, and regular OB and Board updates. Some 300 + stakeholders were involved in this process, including the NFU, which was duly briefed at formal meetings during the process.” [/I] [B]This doesn't sound right, it sounds made up, I would even go so far as to say a lie. This needs to be transparent. Who has actually seen, or been involved in any of this? That list of people above would amount to more than 1000. Statistically that in itself is so significant that it is nothing short of a miracle that nobody else has mentioned it.[/B] [I]" Address stakeholder engagement and relations as a priority:...We understand that Red Tractor intends to commit resource and time to engaging with farmers in coming months, "[/I] [B]It's strange that now, after the report, farmers suddenly become stakeholders. This is probably the single biggest admission of the contempt that farmers have been treated with.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Red tractor stakeholder survey on governance
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top