I have just had this bought to my attention.
Red tractor survey to ‘inform’ the reviewers.
first I have heard of it, nothing in the latest member matters, on any email or on social media.
feels like they are trying to keep it quiet as usual.
I think this just goes to show how much of a farce the whole of RT is and makes you wonder if CT are complicit in it all.
So now it is available we need to get as many ordinary farmer members of RT to fill it in so that they might atleast get a little bit of a feel of the try sentiment members have towards RT.I have been told, just now by someone who should know that this survey was meant only for people directly involved with the governance of red tractor. So the ownership bodies, boards and their members and technical committees.
Whitewash review anyone?
That didn't take long!!
I have just had this bought to my attention.
Red tractor survey to ‘inform’ the reviewers.
first I have heard of it, nothing in the latest member matters, on any email or on social media.
feels like they are trying to keep it quiet as usual.
It not only looks a micky mouse survey, it is a micky mouse survey!whats to stop some one filling it in with a name like andrew and maybe some big estate as the business it looks a micky mouse survey
Pretty crap really. Also allows more than one submission from same IP address, which is a surprise.whats to stop some one filling it in with a name like andrew and maybe some big estate as the business it looks a micky mouse survey
It would appear to me to be to get a load of "selected" interested parties to respond to say how wonderful they felt RT is and how well it is governed, so they could include that in the review report and provide "evidence" that there is little wrong with the governance of Red Tractor.Pretty crap really.
Not sure what the point was to be honest.
Well hopefully, with some prodding we can change that perception....It would appear to me to be to get a load of "selected" interested parties to respond to say how wonderful they felt RT is and how well it is governed, so they could include that in the review report and provide "evidence" that there is little wrong with the governance of Red Tractor.
It would appear that Campbell Tickell don't regard farmers as "stakeholders" in Red Tractor, I think this is symptomatic of the issues the review should be addressing!
We are stakeholders, Red Tractor affects us more than any other group. The fact we are not actively being consulted as part of the review just perpetuates the problems. Will the NFU(and other farming unions)/AHDB/RT etc never learn?
I despair of the governance of our industry at the moment, I really do. UK Ag needs good representation right now but none of the established "big players" seem able to offer anything useful.
Oh and a Happy New Year!
It would appear to me to be to get a load of "selected" interested parties to respond to say how wonderful they felt RT is and how well it is governed, so they could include that in the review report and provide "evidence" that there is little wrong with the governance of Red Tractor.
@Chris F @Clive
I have just had this bought to my attention.
Red tractor survey to ‘inform’ the reviewers.
first I have heard of it, nothing in the latest member matters, on any email or on social media.
feels like they are trying to keep it quiet as usual.