Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
RPA appeal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Feldspar" data-source="post: 7957887" data-attributes="member: 386"><p>There are two aspects to my complaint, the unsatisfactory dealings with the RPA machine that the above quote relates to, and the judgment made by the RPA about my penalty. I have been unsure whether to raise both publicly until the full process has run its course.</p><p></p><p>For my agreement £6k was not a huge % of the annual claim, but the implication that I have acted dishonestly is the black mark that matters. Had the inconsistent application of their laws resulted in a much bigger fine, then it would not just be a reputational problem. As with others on this thread, they have the capacity to threaten the viability of businesses, and it's an issue that will make me think very carefully about whether to participate in ELMS.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Feldspar, post: 7957887, member: 386"] There are two aspects to my complaint, the unsatisfactory dealings with the RPA machine that the above quote relates to, and the judgment made by the RPA about my penalty. I have been unsure whether to raise both publicly until the full process has run its course. For my agreement £6k was not a huge % of the annual claim, but the implication that I have acted dishonestly is the black mark that matters. Had the inconsistent application of their laws resulted in a much bigger fine, then it would not just be a reputational problem. As with others on this thread, they have the capacity to threaten the viability of businesses, and it's an issue that will make me think very carefully about whether to participate in ELMS. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Tenant Farming, Subsidies, BPS & Legal Issues
RPA appeal
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top