Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Sausages now ok
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Muck Spreader" data-source="post: 6692204" data-attributes="member: 137"><p>Nothing wrong with it being an epidemiological study, is where and how the data was collected that is often highly questionable. In the world academia data sets are highly desirable and the more papers you can wring out of it the better. The problems arise when for example a longitudinal survey designed to look specifically at ageing is then used to extract data on something it wasn't designed for like vegan health benefits. Also, there are a number of well known long term general surveys on the go, these are often referenced as the prime data source, yet you know it cannot supply many of the inférences in the paper quoting them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Muck Spreader, post: 6692204, member: 137"] Nothing wrong with it being an epidemiological study, is where and how the data was collected that is often highly questionable. In the world academia data sets are highly desirable and the more papers you can wring out of it the better. The problems arise when for example a longitudinal survey designed to look specifically at ageing is then used to extract data on something it wasn't designed for like vegan health benefits. Also, there are a number of well known long term general surveys on the go, these are often referenced as the prime data source, yet you know it cannot supply many of the inférences in the paper quoting them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Sausages now ok
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top