Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Twitter advert
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="puppet" data-source="post: 7357787" data-attributes="member: 25962"><p>I think the IPCC originally said that agriculture/forestry contributed 23% of GHG and mitigated against 24% of all other emissions. It was around page 86 of the report but most media only reported on the emissions.</p><p>Some of the predictions were very wide</p><p>When you have figures +/- 50% can we rely on the science?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="puppet, post: 7357787, member: 25962"] I think the IPCC originally said that agriculture/forestry contributed 23% of GHG and mitigated against 24% of all other emissions. It was around page 86 of the report but most media only reported on the emissions. Some of the predictions were very wide When you have figures +/- 50% can we rely on the science? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Twitter advert
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top