SilliamWhale
Member
Some of the varieties were encouraged to consider as "outclassed" have performed well this year eg Cassia. Others have been pretty poor. It hasn't been a great year weatherwise but it hasn't been that bad.
Are the new ones being overmarketed and the older ones being undersold or promoted as outdated too quickly. I realise trials show improvements but it doesn't translate to field scale so seamlessly - is that a fault of us as farmers or is it a flaw in the testing process ie are the types of trials at the moment doing enough?
I'm not doing a seed variety knocking thread, but I'm asking do you feel you get back what you want from variety development? I suppose one strong argument is greater fungal resistance - does it stand scrutiny in the field though?
Are the new ones being overmarketed and the older ones being undersold or promoted as outdated too quickly. I realise trials show improvements but it doesn't translate to field scale so seamlessly - is that a fault of us as farmers or is it a flaw in the testing process ie are the types of trials at the moment doing enough?
I'm not doing a seed variety knocking thread, but I'm asking do you feel you get back what you want from variety development? I suppose one strong argument is greater fungal resistance - does it stand scrutiny in the field though?