Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New resources
Latest activity
Trending Threads
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
FarmTV
Farm Compare
Search
Tokens/Searches
Calendar
Upcoming Events
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
New Resources
New posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Vegan threat? what vegan threat?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DaveGrohl" data-source="post: 6678959" data-attributes="member: 3563"><p>I'm almost finished the Wilks v Kresser podcast now (having listened to the Kresser garotting of Gamechangers). Gotta say it's hard going. Wilks is succeeding in bullying Kresser with his overly aggressive delivery but he really isn't making a convincing case for himself. He is very much defending his film and is undestandably angry about being called out about the overall slant of the film. The problem is that he is picking the tiniest holes in some of Kresser's sentences from the previous podcast rather than addressing the actual problems with his own arguements. Also he is talking soo fast it's difficult to comprehend every word he is saying, there's no time to process.</p><p></p><p>It's glaringly obvious to the listener that Kresser is just wishing he would go away, he's clearly intimidated by Wilks' shouting at him, he's a UFC fighter after all among other things. This does not convince the intelligent listener. His opening refusal to see that he was calling black white over dairy sets the tone for the rest of the podcast. What is puzzling is that Rogan seems to be swayed by Wilks' ranting and brow beating. Clearly being in the room is different from listening at a safe distance. Rogan saying that Wilks "knocked B12 out of the park" is just laughable. The upshot was that vegans should take supplements, as opposed to Kresser's arguement that it's difficult for the average consumer to remain healthy on a pure vegan diet.</p><p></p><p>Next podcast I'm gonna listen to is the Brian Sanders dissection of the Wilks v Kresser "debate". Talk about disappearing down a rabbit hole lol.</p><p></p><p>Btw I really wouldn't recommend anyone follows me down the rabbit hole, these podcasts are looooong and need to be listened to over a period of days to maintain enough attention.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DaveGrohl, post: 6678959, member: 3563"] I'm almost finished the Wilks v Kresser podcast now (having listened to the Kresser garotting of Gamechangers). Gotta say it's hard going. Wilks is succeeding in bullying Kresser with his overly aggressive delivery but he really isn't making a convincing case for himself. He is very much defending his film and is undestandably angry about being called out about the overall slant of the film. The problem is that he is picking the tiniest holes in some of Kresser's sentences from the previous podcast rather than addressing the actual problems with his own arguements. Also he is talking soo fast it's difficult to comprehend every word he is saying, there's no time to process. It's glaringly obvious to the listener that Kresser is just wishing he would go away, he's clearly intimidated by Wilks' shouting at him, he's a UFC fighter after all among other things. This does not convince the intelligent listener. His opening refusal to see that he was calling black white over dairy sets the tone for the rest of the podcast. What is puzzling is that Rogan seems to be swayed by Wilks' ranting and brow beating. Clearly being in the room is different from listening at a safe distance. Rogan saying that Wilks "knocked B12 out of the park" is just laughable. The upshot was that vegans should take supplements, as opposed to Kresser's arguement that it's difficult for the average consumer to remain healthy on a pure vegan diet. Next podcast I'm gonna listen to is the Brian Sanders dissection of the Wilks v Kresser "debate". Talk about disappearing down a rabbit hole lol. Btw I really wouldn't recommend anyone follows me down the rabbit hole, these podcasts are looooong and need to be listened to over a period of days to maintain enough attention. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Farm Business
Agricultural Matters
Vegan threat? what vegan threat?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top