Goweresque
Member
- Location
- North Wilts
By 1990 we had nothing but combinable crops after gradually divesting ourselves of sheep cattle and sugar beet as the old folks health declined. By 2005 the soils were lifeless, yields were declining and problems like blackgrass and cranesbill were increasing. Since then we have gradually brought the sheep and cattle back, and this year the beet has returned. It's not been easy but if feels like a more balanced system. The cattle use the straw and produce muck. The sheep and cattle complement one another with regard to grazing. The sheep eat the beet tops. A lot less land stands idle over winter. Wider rotation limits opportunity for blackgrass. Soil structure is improving. We have retrieved skills that would have otherwise been lost to us. We aren't experts or specialists but we can ask for help, delegate or do a bit of training. It feels more like a full time job now rather than a mad rush for harvest and drilling then hours in the sprayer. The bottom line might not be a fortune but it's more stable. Less eggs in more baskets, less boom and bust.
I know this run counter to the present trend. I am not really bothered how others run their businesses nor am I telling people how they should work. I am just commenting on what I think we lose as farmers and farm businesses when we polarise into specialisms.
Thing is I don't disagree with you that arable farms need to get more livestock into their rotations if they can, where I disagree is that I don't think arable farmers should try and keep livestock themselves. I think the future will be symbiotic business relationships whereby the livestock owner and keeper works in conjunction with the arable farmer, and each continues his or her specialism, but on the same farm.