UK Farm Support......THE POLL!!

Should the UK general public support farmers OR pay actual true cost of food production?

  • Yes they should continue to support their own farmers

  • No we should import food from other countries who support their farmers


Results are only viewable after voting.
how do you inte
Compared to UK agriculture debt levels in NZ are very high.
I will let you draw your own conclusions on a country with high debt levels and no subs having a vibrant agricultural industry compared to a heavily subsidised agricultural sector in the UK running low debt levels yet complaining that the sky is falling in.
how do you intend to clear this huge debt?
 

tepapa

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
North Wales
BUT NZ have replaced subs with debt.........
I think you need to put things in perspective. Nz sub's stopped over 30 years ago. The increase in debt is more recent as farm systems have changed, land price has increased.

Edit: that's like sub's stopping in UK next year and you saying in 30+ years time I will have more debt than I do now. Who knows how things will be in 30 years.
 
I think you need to put things in perspective. Nz sub's stopped over 30 years ago. The increase in debt is more recent as farm systems have changed, land price has increased.

Edit: that's like sub's stopping in UK next year and you saying in 30+ years time I will have more debt than I do now. Who knows how things will be in 30 years.
. The increase in debt is more recent as farm systems have changed, land price has increased.

recent yes because commodity prices have been on the floor the past 5 years and they are recieving no support, wise?
 

digger64

Member
thats the conclusion i'm rapidly coming to.....after some googling and reading

by the time you factor in a better climate and slightly lower regs there ain't a fag packet in it

undoubtly they've championed some of the best techniqes in the world....but it isn't enough
Depends what the debt is against surely they have to be productive - sitting on the fence claiming schemes doesn't need much working capital does it ?
 

DrWazzock

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
The way I see it is as follows.

Yes you can keep taking the subsidy but the State that pays the subsidy will want a bigger and bigger say in how you run your business. They might even effectively want a share in your business, a bit like the Dragons in the TV programme.

If you are happy to relinquish control and I would imagine eventually ownership of your business to the State then carry on as you are and don't bother making any plans to live without subsidy.

The way it looks to me, after speaking to RPA at various shows etc, the government of all colours aren't particularly interested in agricultural production but are interested in environmental schemes. Environmental schemes will come with a large dose of the government sticking it's nose into your business.

That's the way it is. Governments aren't interested in subsidising production. They are interested in environmental goods.

I am not interested in ending up as a government employed park ranger but it might suit some.

The idea that we can hold out for yet more food production subsidy is about as dead as corduroy IMO.
 

digger64

Member
ThDefra ' s land see it is as follows.

Yes you can keep taking the subsidy but the State that pays the subsidy will want a bigger and bigger say in how you run your business. They might even effectively want a share in your business, a bit like the Dragons in the TV programme.

If you are happy to relinquish control and I would imagine eventually ownership of your business to the State then carry on as you are and don't bother making any plans to live without subsidy.

The way it looks to me, after speaking to RPA at various shows etc, the government of all colours aren't particularly interested in agricultural production but are interested in environmental schemes. Environmental schemes will come with a large dose of the government sticking it's nose into your business.

That's the way it is. Governments aren't interested in subsidising production. They are interested in environmental goods.

I am not interested in ending up as a government employed park ranger but it might suit some.

The idea that we can hold out for yet more food production subsidy is about as dead as corduroy IMO.
The article in the farmers guardian this week re - "defra's land management plans " appears to confirm this and talks of "whole farm plan " sell your souls or what ?
 

Pasty

Member
Location
Devon
the poll results make interesting reading despite the comments
What are the current results? I can't vote as neither answer fits what I think. It's an OR question but the second option is not the same as the OR. I think the electoral commission would have issues with this one.
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
And just have a look at the price of wheat now and tell me that you really believe subsidies keep food prices down. Food prices are only very slightly influenced by subsidy here. Mostly they are set by global supply and demand. That's why we have ports.
They don't have any form of subsidies in any other countries then ?
 

DrWazzock

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
We used to have 12 cow milking herds and folk getting a living from a few hundred laying hens.

Times keep a changjng and they always will. A lot of small farms are let now to big operators. In all honesty it's probably more economically efficient. The work still gets done. The food still gets produced.

It's better to adapt than to keep moaning about it.
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
What are the current results? I can't vote as neither answer fits what I think. It's an OR question but the second option is not the same as the OR. I think the electoral commission would have issues with this one.
Nearly 100% for supporting our farmers :whistle::whistle::unsure::dead::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
We used to have 12 cow milking herds and folk getting a living from a few hundred laying hens.

Times keep a changjng and they always will. A lot of small farms are let now to big operators. In all honesty it's probably more economically efficient. The work still gets done. The food still gets produced.

It's better to adapt than to keep moaning about it.
I don't think there is feck all .more economical about some of these big operations
 

DrWazzock

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
They don't have any form of subsidies in any other countries then ?

I was led to believe that direct subsidies for production were ruled out by WTO rules though I could be wrong. That's why we have payments for trimming hedges and that other non productive crap.

If foreign governments want use their own people's taxes to produce cheap food for us then that's their lookout. Can't say as a taxpayer I'd be over keen on subsidising farmers to flood markets with cheap food to keep foreign customers happy. I don't believe it happens anyway.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 116 38.3%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 116 38.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 42 13.9%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 6 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 5 1.7%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 18 5.9%

Expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive offer for farmers published

  • 222
  • 1
Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer from July will give the sector a clear path forward and boost farm business resilience.

From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and The Rt Hon Sir Mark Spencer MP Published21 May 2024

s300_Farmland_with_farmFarmland_with_farmhouse_and_grazing_cattle_in_the_UK_Farm_scene__diversification__grazing__rural__beef_GettyImages-165174232.jpg

Full details of the expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer available to farmers from July have been published by the...
Top