River Lugg, Herefordshire

Status
Not open for further replies.

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
It's winter here so land is waterlogged and an extra inch running into a valley can cause a problem. So do you leave a 20m grass margin and get penalised?

I suppose the answer is, don't have a barely established crop going into winter if it's going to cause a problem?
Permanent pasture or a thick growing cover crop after cereals that would preserve the topsoil until spring. Maybe direct drilling the crop would have helped, it looks like there had been a lot of surface cultivation.
 

Bury the Trash

Member
Mixed Farmer
need a long dipper and swing it right around, then get some grass seed on it toot sweet else it will wash back in with the next flood.
best done in low water through the summer
 

Bury the Trash

Member
Mixed Farmer
I suppose the answer is, don't have a barely established crop going into winter if it's going to cause a problem?
Permanent pasture or a thick growing cover crop after cereals that would preserve the topsoil until spring. Maybe direct drilling the crop would have helped, it looks like there had been a lot of surface cultivation.
same with any water course the wider the margin the better chance of saving soil .
 

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
So what are you supposed to do with it?

That's the problem all the agencies have too isn't it, they can't do anything with the spoil?
Last time I was over there a chap was telling me they can't dredge canals any more because its classed as waste and they can't afford to get rid. Eventually the canals will be full but it's just getting ignored.
 

Wombat

Member
BASIS
Location
East yorks
need a long dipper and swing it right around, then get some grass seed on it toot sweet else it will wash back in with the next flood.
best done in low water through the summer

Problem if you do it at low water is getting it out the bucket, u need a bit of water flow to get it out and make it a bit loose otherwise the first bucket and it’s blocked for the rest of the day
 

Bury the Trash

Member
Mixed Farmer
Problem if you do it at low water is getting it out the bucket, u need a bit of water flow to get it out and make it a bit loose otherwise the first bucket and it’s blocked for the rest of the day
depends on your type but here if youve got clay in the bucket (thats obviously hard to get out) then youve gone a bit to deep,bit too greedy it should be looser ie silt or deposited stuff rather than the river bed sort of thing which is way easier to tipout.

dont want to lose it down stream either.
 

Vader

Member
Mixed Farmer
Place it onto the field anywhere within a digger’s reach, though as mentioned above not directly on the bank.

Putting it into a trailer or such to move it away it magically becomes “waste” 🙄 It’s a bit like the magic of Red Tractor but in reverse!
Sure that was an Old EU rule, so we could change that now if our strong gov knew about it.
Wait.....
 

Hfd Cattle

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Hereford
I can see the EA dragging their heels taking JP to court, public opinion is appearing to be over 50% in support of the work done, even the dimmest of them must be able to see the merits of the job and many holding the purse strings will see the cost difference. The insurance industry will be in favour of reduced risks, the list is pretty long. The only thing the EA can bring a case with is their flawed principles.
Arise 'Sir Johnny Price '
The man will go down as a legend . Far more deserving of a Knighthood than any of the others that have got it .
Hopefully he will move on to start the Hereford Bypas next !
 

Exfarmer

Member
Location
Bury St Edmunds
It used to be a golden rule that dredgimgs should be left on the bank as close to the ditch as possible, that way invertebrates could return home easily. Before it all dried out and they died. Then in summer you spread it about and reseeded.
I would be amazed if there is any general directive that dredgings from Canals, rivers or ditches are contaminated, but if you do an “ assessment” it could certainly be factored in and will help make the decision not to go ahead, easier to justify.
you can be sure that any chemical analysis of material at the bottom of a river, canal , ditch , pond etc, will reveal the presence of hydrocarbons. The fact that 99% of that will be entirely natural is irrelevant.
Anyone who has done such work will know that rainbow sheen you often get on spoil straight out of a wet ditch.
 

Ffermer Bach

Member
Livestock Farmer
being serious, I am pretty sure, one reason there is no dredging is because the "spoil" is classed as contaminated waste and has to be disposed of as such, and I think if we did a chemical analysis of it, it would be too, I am not sure if it is cross compliance or a glastir reg, that you must not use spoil from a ditch to level up low spots in a field (I can't for the life of me think why not), if you were to always spread next to the ditch, you end up blocking surface water running into it!
 

Wombat

Member
BASIS
Location
East yorks
I can’t imagine this field scale flooding does the animals and bugs that live in the fields and hedgerows much good.

If ELMS is planning to encourage more flood storage on farmland, but also protect the bugs, beetles, birds etc and their habitats then it’s going to end up a bit of a contradiction.

Exactly, we seem to get more and more frogs every year with a bit of ditch management and some pond work than just letting everything flood and go stagnant
 
Would the ditch spoil be as such a disposal problem if were done little and often ?
The River Steeping, that flooded Wainfleet in summer 2019, is a case in point.
A study of it reported for every meter length of riverbank, there is 15 cubic meters of spoil to remove to clean it properly.
If it was done by excavator, from one side, there isn’t enough room to put it all !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 118 38.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 118 38.4%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 42 13.7%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 6 2.0%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 18 5.9%

Expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive offer for farmers published

  • 231
  • 1
Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer from July will give the sector a clear path forward and boost farm business resilience.

From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and The Rt Hon Sir Mark Spencer MP Published21 May 2024

s300_Farmland_with_farmFarmland_with_farmhouse_and_grazing_cattle_in_the_UK_Farm_scene__diversification__grazing__rural__beef_GettyImages-165174232.jpg

Full details of the expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer available to farmers from July have been published by the...
Top