The Red Tractor ACCS referendum

Would you leave or remain a Red Tractor ACCS member ?

  • Yes, I would resign my Red Tractor (ACCS) membership and join a new "equal to imports" Scheme

    Votes: 659 96.1%
  • No, I would remain in the Red Tractor scheme

    Votes: 27 3.9%

  • Total voters
    686

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
That's what they're after. And I suspect they'll try and do it with cattle first (as not so many sheep men are assured).

If they do bring in WLA, then I do hope that the suckler men stick it out.

RT for beef and sheep is a nonsense really when you think about. RT and supermarkets will say how we've got to have the red tractor on the product. But the know full well it's only for the last 90 days, and ignore the previous 810 days of the bullocks life. Suggests to me that RT assurance isn't all so vital to the supermarket after all.
It suggests that things are fine as they are.
when batters was trying to bring in WLA a few years ago I asked how it would benefit anyone bar RT and their inspectors over the status quo and could get an answer because there isn't one
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
no you are quite wrong WLA should not be in place, things are ok as they are thank you very much and to say any different just smacks of jealousy.
It makes no mockery, those are the rules and they are fine as they are, much like the rules that let you use non organic straw do you think those rules make a mockery of organic or are you happy with them as they are, yes I thought so you are happy with them as they are
Fail to see what straw my cattle lie upon has any relevance to this magic that occurs in the RT process.

The RT scheme is a mockery as animals only have to spend, if sold at 30 months 10% of their life being assured.
What happens if an animal has a broken needle in it? Being sold as non assured there is nothing in place to prevent that from being sold to a FA finisher.
Stocking densities not being adhered to etc.

Wouldn't give the consumer any confidence in the scheme IMHO.

Perhaps if the media found this out the whole scheme would fall flat on its arse!
 

Bury the Trash

Member
Mixed Farmer
Fail to see what straw my cattle lie upon has any relevance to this magic that occurs in the RT process.

The RT scheme is a mockery as animals only have to spend, if sold at 30 months 10% of their life being assured.
What happens if an animal has a broken needle in it? Being sold as non assured there is nothing in place to prevent that from being sold to a FA finisher.
Stocking densities not being adhered to etc.

Wouldn't give the consumer any confidence in the scheme IMHO.

Perhaps if the media found this out the whole scheme would fall flat on its arse!
aamoi whats the broken needle policy on imported foreign Beef ?or pig meat or chicken :oops: for that matter. for Beef its mainly minced i suppose so the needle will be ground down :hilarious::sick:
Absolutely no difference to feed mills buying non RT inputs , GM even , from abroad either.
 

manhill

Member
It’s really simple to the consumer.
Hovis make a loaf of medium white pre sliced bread with flour from a mixed sample and another one from RT assured UK only sample.
Which one sells first?
Hint: Sainsbury’s et al, already know.
never mind the wheat, is the soya in it farm assured?
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
aamoi whats the broken needle policy on imported foreign Beef ?or pig meat or chicken :oops: for that matter. for Beef its mainly minced i suppose so the needle will be ground down :hilarious::sick:
Absolutely no difference to feed mills buying non RT inputs , GM even , from abroad either.
I don't disagree, what i am saying is the whole assurance scheme is now a waste of time.
Latest proposal for dairy, and I would guess for arable is about worker accommodation.
WTF has that to do with food safety?
Anyway the proposal is easy to get around, you "sell" the temporary accommodation to the worker upon arrival, and buy it back when they leave. No longer have to check boilers , electrics etc.
Makes a mockery of whole system
 

Clive

Staff Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lichfield
But if you get £20/less for non assured and its costing you, as you state in the article in additional work to comply, say £25/t to do that , why are you bothering?

there is no buyer of Uk milling wheat or osr not rt assured - if I left the scheme I would have to change my cropping, feed wheat doesn’t give as good margins on my soil type and the feed I did grow would have to sell at a discount to RT feed or imported feed

and even if I did leave RT I would still be forced to pay towards it via the AHDB levy I pay on every tonne of wheat I sell
 

Sid

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
South Molton
there is no buyer of Uk milling wheat or osr not rt assured - if I left the scheme I would have to change my cropping, feed wheat doesn’t give as good margins on my soil type and the feed I did grow would have to sell at a discount to RT feed or imported feed

and even if I did leave RT I would still be forced to pay towards it via the AHDB levy I pay on every tonne of wheat I sell
Thanks for clarification on that.

Trying to get up to speed a bit on grain side for future discussions.
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
Fail to see what straw my cattle lie upon has any relevance to this magic that occurs in the RT process.

The RT scheme is a mockery as animals only have to spend, if sold at 30 months 10% of their life being assured.
What happens if an animal has a broken needle in it? Being sold as non assured there is nothing in place to prevent that from being sold to a FA finisher.
Stocking densities not being adhered to etc.

Wouldn't give the consumer any confidence in the scheme IMHO.

Perhaps if the media found this out the whole scheme would fall flat on its arse!
Perhaps we should let the mainstream media know what's going on. Giving a beef animal a RT sticker 'cos it's been assured for 10% of it's life is (in my mind) very close to deceiving the consumer - it's not exactly lying, but it's been a bit economical with the truth.

How would advertising standards view this I wonder?
 

Drillman

Member
Mixed Farmer
According to Mr Smith there’s no point spouting off on social media.

well what are the non NFU member supposed to do then as there’s nothing been organised for those guys to respond other than a tick box consultation document which doesn’t really give freedom of speech.

And as for Mr Mosley and I quote...


Most retailers require RT assurance

a couple of paragraphs later

RT membership is voluntary!

so it’s voluntary but most retailers won’t accept non RT products according to him.
 

redsloe

Member
Location
Cornwall
According to Mr Smith there’s no point spouting off on social media.

well what are the non NFU member supposed to do then as there’s nothing been organised for those guys to respond other than a tick box consultation document which doesn’t really give freedom of speech.

And as for Mr Mosley and I quote...


Most retailers require RT assurance

a couple of paragraphs later

RT membership is voluntary!

so it’s voluntary but most retailers won’t accept non RT products according to him.
Well, it is voluntary!

Trouble is I can't store grain in a CS without certification and can't sell my beef in the abbatior that's 5 minutes from me without certification.

On the other hand I could travel 30 miles to a market and sell stores non assured.

Which is wrong imo.
 

Two Tone

Member
Mixed Farmer
Uuuumm
Can we all write 'letters to the editor' to Farmers Weekly. Lets back Clive up in the article, and point out the parts of RT that are nonsense or overburdensome.
Uuumm...!
Not sure if this is a bit of a problem for me or just a coincidence.

I went down to my local village paper shop this very morning and cancelled my weekly order for the FW!
I explained to the lovely lady who owns it that it was nothing to do with her and that I regretted not being able to continue supporting her with sales, but that FW has become such a rubbish magazine recently that all it ever now does is depress me, having read it.
She said that she wasn’t surprised and that sales of FW have definitely dropped off over the last year or two.

This comes as a bit more of a milestone to me as I used to write for it as an Arable Focus writer.
But I now regard it as a very poor relative of its former glory days that usually ends up ruining my entire weekends.

I must admit as to not having read this weeks version, before cancelling my order.
How strange that it should be the very week that @Clive appears in and the very first time I have ever seen TFF mentioned in it!

I am also disappointed indeed in @Guy Smith ’s argument.

So, in conclusion @Clive, hopefully you will see my action today as a positive one towards you and TFF, rather than a negative one, which just so happen to be a rather bizarre coincidence!
 

texelburger

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Herefordshire
According to Mr Smith there’s no point spouting off on social media.

well what are the non NFU member supposed to do then as there’s nothing been organised for those guys to respond other than a tick box consultation document which doesn’t really give freedom of speech.

And as for Mr Mosley and I quote...


Most retailers require RT assurance

a couple of paragraphs later

RT membership is voluntary!

so it’s voluntary but most retailers won’t accept non RT products according to him.
I must admit to being slightly offended by the comment " no point spouting off on social media" ,perhaps they're getting a little agitated by the the TFF where farmers are using the platform to unify and vent their anger at tthe RT cartel.I was very surprised to read that 70 % of consumers recognised the RT brand,my own little non scientific poll in my local area/ pub suggested the figure to be much,much lower.Perhaps it was the way they worded the questions .
 

DRC

Member
First thing everyone needs to do is resign from the NFU and tell them why.
something I did when crop assurance was first foisted on us.
Also worth speaking to your merchant . Are they on our side or happy to go along with it. After all it’s the merchants I sell my grain to, not a mill or crusher .
They seem very quiet on the subject .
 

Steevo

Member
Location
Gloucestershire

they are happy to talk "at you" in Farmers weekly but won't engage "with you" here

So to sum up from first glance....


Those paid by RT and part of the "system" think it's the best thing since sliced bread and want it to continue.

Those that actually produce the goods that this assurance mark is supposedly adding value to don't see any value in it at all.


I take from this that the only reason Red Tractor exists is because Red Tractor want it to. :rolleyes:
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 107 40.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 97 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 40 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.1%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 4.9%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 2,398
  • 48
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top