You keep both but any taxpayer support should be targeted at the small guy, for fecks sake they don't pay tax benefits to the rich & poor alike why should they do so in farming!!So do you keep one big one or ,3 little ones
You keep both but any taxpayer support should be targeted at the small guy, for fecks sake they don't pay tax benefits to the rich & poor alike why should they do so in farming!!So do you keep one big one or ,3 little ones
Their are guys with nearly ten million borrowed with droves of staff , they ain’t going to fair over well without subs are they . The small farm with no debt just go get a job or a part time job or diversification for a few years or for ever , what will the big boys do ?Suckler bred cattle used to get a premium for their meat,now it’s just beef as everyone in the food chain is wanting that extra dollar off .Sadly it’s the start of food chain that pays the price not the end .Why does everyone think it’s only small farms that need the subs, wait until those lottery chqs stop falling in the letter box in December .I bet a lot of small farms will somehow make their small amount up.Time all this sub money went on everything,turbines don’t get me going.EU money for expansion of all business let’s face it the bigger you are the bigger the chq,why knock small business or farmers most have not had the chance to access all grants,subs.
Big could not be more inefficient if it tried !If big is efficient, why do they need subsidy?
The unlimited payment of iacs and bps and to a lesser extrnt sfp has encouraged estates to empty out tenants and become “ farmers” which in history has never worked and will fail again.
The countryside has emptied at a frightening rate in the last twenty years which could have been lessened if support was tapered off as the eu originally intended but vetoed by uk govt
Supply and demand are the main drivers and set the price of food --- Transport is so cheap (at the moment) that this is the overwhelming price setter . Other factors have a much smaller effect
Did your farmer in Morocco sell in bulk to a processor or to smaller butchers/individuals where he would have received a premium? I know that when I sell lamb to a processor at £60 i can still get £140 head as a direct seller
Far too sensible.
I'm sure that would have been discussed at the time, but I imagine the land owning Lords would have lobbied against it!
ExactlyTheir are guys with nearly ten million borrowed with droves of staff , they ain’t going to fair over well without subs are they . The small farm with no debt just go get a job or a part time job or diversification for a few years or for ever , what will the big boys do ?
Big could not be more inefficient if it tried !
That is not support, what you lose in production from that 10% is not covered by the benefit of the trees, at the end of the day it is not extra support it's simply swopping one income for another, you are not replacing the existing extra support!plant trees on your worst 10 per cent to save the planet and the gov pay you to do it I guess sub was supposed to allow Mr farmer to produce cheap food but still survive????
Take a farm feeding a super market with 10000 fat cattle if he nets £20.00 head he’s dose ok , man fattening 100 cattle can’t do it for 20quid a head can he ?why does farms getting bigger cause the demise of the small farms though? the same amount is being produced just by less people so the smaller guys profits should be unaffected? he can continue on with his small farm if he wishes to do so
All farmhouses cottages and buildings should have a section 75 slapped on them to keep them only for agricultural people.The only warning I’ll sound is that round here any permanent pasture subsidy would more likely be drawn by very wealthy incomers from London who buy a small farm for its amenity value and graze a few rare breeds on it as a financially unviable hobby. In this part of the world small farms that stand on their own feet run by natives are very few and far between. There are others run as offshoots of other businesses by fairly hard nosed businessmen for various not altogether altruistic reasons.
Be very careful how you design support schemes because many small farms are nothing like the stereotype that people think they are.
That’s the sum of it . Same happened with eggs and pigs. Greed was what killed it.Take a farm feeding a super market with 10000 fat cattle if he nets £20.00 head he’s dose ok , man fattening 100 cattle can’t do it for 20quid a head can he ?
Are their enough agricultural people left ? Not enough money in agg to bring a lot of the property’s up to standard .All farmhouses cottages and buildings should have a section 75 slapped on them to keep them only for agricultural people.
Yes it is limited to 90 head i think
All farmhouses cottages and buildings should have a section 75 slapped on them to keep them only for agricultural people.
It’s just part of our average payment , over the border it’s incorporated in the payment , that’s why more cows gone south of here they collect the money without the cow , we need the cow to collect the money .Is it capped
Almost gone the same way with milk. £1.35 for 2 litres at the supermarket. No one really looks at the price,it just gets put in the trolley.That’s the sum of it . Same happened with eggs and pigs. Greed was what killed it.
Easy to say when you have more than 60 to 100 acres but won’t be long till the 1000 acres is in same position .some will survive some won’t. Some make 60 acres into a full time job when it isn’t.
horses for courses it might do a few people a favour and make the decision for them end not have 100 years of guilt on them for been The generation to give up.