Solid urea use restricted and to be regulated by Red Tractor

Flat 10

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Fen Edge
Who are there corporate members? Can you check?
I don't think so. There was a comment where it said what the technical name for the type of organisation the NFU is. It's not a union I believe because its not 1 member 1 vote and it choses not to publish its membership list. I may have the details wrong but that was the crux of it. I found it very interesting. It may have been @traineefarmer
 

teslacoils

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
Collective agreements made by union negotiation would be binding on members of a traditional craft or trade union. I'm not sure farmers have mighty enough ballbags for a "1 member 1 vote / one out all out" style of union but I'd love to be shown otherwise.

United we are strong.
 
Last edited:

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
I think you could fairly safely put the seasons urea on in late Feb, in good conditions. So no need at all to go beyond 31.03 with it other than being dry enough to travel.
I am expecting that policing will in practice be just an added tick box alongside looking at fert records.
Can't see a big problem myself, still got urea option, happy days.
Thanks NFU. Which other unified farming industry voice do you all imagine has been lobbying for this, it won't have been CF.
And NFU members who are not RT ?
 

teslacoils

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire

Attachments

  • 0_NlBXlqqselhBJL89.jpg
    0_NlBXlqqselhBJL89.jpg
    69.3 KB · Views: 0

Two Tone

Member
Mixed Farmer
It is a load of Bollox to suggest that AN is any better for the environment than Urea.

This April the 1st cut off date for using will make using Urea less efficient because it would be used too early for the main dressing. One of the advantages of using Urea is that we only need to use it twice on a cereal crop. There is no need to split the main dressing into two, which in itself has got to be better for the environment in tractor fuel usage anyway. Not forgetting that approx 25% less need to made and hauled to the farm.

Many other countries have banned AN, because it is used in the Explosives industry. Many of those countries have a climate where volatilisation could be possible, whereas in the UK it almost certainly can’t. On top of which we suffer from infinitely more leaching from AN than volatilisation from Urea.

It is an absolute stitch-up!
 

Lothian

Member
BASE UK Member
Location
Sunny Scotland
Looks like there is a potential get out of jail card here:

The new Red Tractor farm assurance standard proposed is:
• Fertiliser containing Urea must only be applied where the following requirements are
met:
o protected/inhibited fertilisers containing solid urea can be applied within any
product use-by/best before dates
o protected/inhibited fertilisers containing liquid urea can be applied with the
prescribed rate of protector/inhibitor for the application, and within any product
use by/best before dates
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited solid fertiliser containing urea can only be
applied between 15th January and 31st March
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited liquid fertiliser containing urea can be
applied between 15th January and 31st March
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited liquid fertiliser containing urea can be
applied between 1st April and last application in autumn9 only if agronomic
justification is provided by
▪ FACTS-qualified farm personnel10 or
▪ advice specific for the crop has been provided by a FACTS- Qualified
Adviser and been followed (see EC 9.1)

o in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales fertiliser containing urea (solid and
liquid) can be applied as per relevant legislation

So if you are FACTS qualifed or use an agronomist you should be able to justify still using when rain is forecast?
 

Farmer Roy

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
NSW, Newstralya
It is a load of Bollox to suggest that AN is any better for the environment than Urea.

This April the 1st cut off date for using will make using Urea less efficient because it would be used too early for the main dressing. One of the advantages of using Urea is that we only need to use it twice on a cereal crop. There is no need to split the main dressing into two, which in itself has got to be better for the environment in tractor fuel usage anyway. Not forgetting that approx 25% less need to made and hauled to the farm.

Many other countries have banned AN, because it is used in the Explosives industry. Many of those countries have a climate where volatilisation could be possible, whereas in the UK it almost certainly can’t. On top of which we suffer from infinitely more leaching from AN than volatilisation from Urea.

It is an absolute stitch-up!
AN has been banned here for Ag use since 2001 & the twin towers attack
 

Barleymow

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Ipswich
Looks like there is a potential get out of jail card here:

The new Red Tractor farm assurance standard proposed is:
• Fertiliser containing Urea must only be applied where the following requirements are
met:
o protected/inhibited fertilisers containing solid urea can be applied within any
product use-by/best before dates
o protected/inhibited fertilisers containing liquid urea can be applied with the
prescribed rate of protector/inhibitor for the application, and within any product
use by/best before dates
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited solid fertiliser containing urea can only be
applied between 15th January and 31st March
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited liquid fertiliser containing urea can be
applied between 15th January and 31st March
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited liquid fertiliser containing urea can be
applied between 1st April and last application in autumn9 only if agronomic
justification is provided by
▪ FACTS-qualified farm personnel10 or
▪ advice specific for the crop has been provided by a FACTS- Qualified
Adviser and been followed (see EC 9.1)

o in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales fertiliser containing urea (solid and
liquid) can be applied as per relevant legislation

So if you are FACTS qualifed or use an agronomist you should be able to justify still using when rain is forecast?
knowing red tractor we will have to hoover it back up if the forecast rain fails to arrive
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
Looks like there is a potential get out of jail card here:

The new Red Tractor farm assurance standard proposed is:
• Fertiliser containing Urea must only be applied where the following requirements are
met:
o protected/inhibited fertilisers containing solid urea can be applied within any
product use-by/best before dates
o protected/inhibited fertilisers containing liquid urea can be applied with the
prescribed rate of protector/inhibitor for the application, and within any product
use by/best before dates
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited solid fertiliser containing urea can only be
applied between 15th January and 31st March
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited liquid fertiliser containing urea can be
applied between 15th January and 31st March
o in England, unprotected/uninhibited liquid fertiliser containing urea can be
applied between 1st April and last application in autumn9 only if agronomic
justification is provided by
▪ FACTS-qualified farm personnel10 or
▪ advice specific for the crop has been provided by a FACTS- Qualified
Adviser and been followed (see EC 9.1)

o in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales fertiliser containing urea (solid and
liquid) can be applied as per relevant legislation

So if you are FACTS qualifed or use an agronomist you should be able to justify still using when rain is forecast?

As with the Farming Rules For Water (now amended) I suspect a FACTS adviser first recourse will be their Professional Indemnity Insurance before their recommendation pad!
 

snarling bee

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Bedfordshire
NFU and others including NIAB TAG have fought an industry wide opposition to the Governments idea which was to ban Urea. They get a bit of a result and all they get is abuse. FFS.

The EAs interpretation of Rule 1 in Farming Rules for Water has been successfully overturned, more or less, by an industry back lash of which the NFU was a large part. I suppose nobody's happy about that either. I must admit I am extremely grateful as I have 1400 of valuable FYM to spread every autumn and I don't want to be doing it outside of regulation. Its paid my membership fee many times over.
 
NFU and others including NIAB TAG have fought an industry wide opposition to the Governments idea which was to ban Urea. They get a bit of a result and all they get is abuse. FFS.

The EAs interpretation of Rule 1 in Farming Rules for Water has been successfully overturned, more or less, by an industry back lash of which the NFU was a large part. I suppose nobody's happy about that either. I must admit I am extremely grateful as I have 1400 of valuable FYM to spread every autumn and I don't want to be doing it outside of regulation. Its paid my membership fee many times over.

Would it be impossible to show the same level of lobbying enthusiasm and ethics towards private organisation which is acting as a block to market access for UK farmers? And its not even a government initiative its a private one run by spivs and have made themselves unaccountable

And if its not possible, why is it not possible? Why is one organisation being allowed to corner access to the grain market?
 

Grass And Grain

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Yorks
NFU and others including NIAB TAG have fought an industry wide opposition to the Governments idea which was to ban Urea. They get a bit of a result and all they get is abuse. FFS.

The EAs interpretation of Rule 1 in Farming Rules for Water has been successfully overturned, more or less, by an industry back lash of which the NFU was a large part. I suppose nobody's happy about that either. I must admit I am extremely grateful as I have 1400 of valuable FYM to spread every autumn and I don't want to be doing it outside of regulation. Its paid my membership fee many times over.
I agree NFU have brokered the Autumn manure spreading and worked hard for farmers on the urea issue. All good.

Urea spreading policed by RT. Bad imho.

What if you're not RT assured? Can you use Urea, or is it just RT members? Genuine question (I don't know how it's going to work).

Or are non-assured farmers not going to be allowed to use Urea?

Or are non-assured farmers going to be able to use Urea, but RT members have the extra burden of being checked up on. In which case, another disadvantage to being RT assured.

Questions, questions. Don't know the answers
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 107 40.4%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 97 36.6%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 40 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.1%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 4.9%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 2,382
  • 48
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top