There were two options, stay in or leave, there was no detailed plan for either.
I merely responded to your comments on my neutral position on the topic.
That was for immediate no deal exit.
www.theguardian.com
Irony absolute.
The only thing I'm guilty of is voting to leave the EU.
Thanks, confirms my point.
Why won't you answer the question, what are you afraid of...? Should the same standards apply to both sides of the discussion?
Not really; have a go at answering the question in post number 1.
Hang on, when people such as myself - and lots of others - claimed during the referendum campaign that the EU had worked itself into and had influence upon a huge part of our nation's law and administration, that was denied by the Remain camp. They, nationally and on TFF, claimed that the EU was not pervasive, had only the lightest touch and slightest influence on our affairs and that such claims were hyperbolic.
Facts not helpful to them are unlikely to be responded to.
My interpretation was that you asked why isn't it the case that argument is being made - I said that is the case. That is exactly the argument being made.Not really; have a go at answering the question in post number 1.
The worlds largest trading bloc is NAFTA; NAFTA GDP = $24.8trn, EU GDP = $17.4trn .
I did answer post 1.Why won't you answer the question, what are you afraid of...? Should the same standards apply to both sides of the discussion?
Not really; have a go at answering the question in post number 1.
Hang on, when people such as myself - and lots of others - claimed during the referendum campaign that the EU had worked itself into and had influence upon a huge part of our nation's law and administration, that was denied by the Remain camp. They, nationally and on TFF, claimed that the EU was not pervasive, had only the lightest touch and slightest influence on our affairs and that such claims were hyperbolic.
Of course Remain as a group were entirely honest and never set out to mislead anyone in the campaign. So how much of a plan - based on the Remain claims of hardly any EU influence - would a trusting Leaver have thought necessary?
Facts not helpful to them are unlikely to be responded to.
I mean... it was an answer. That you disagree with an answer doesn't make it less of an answer.The worlds largest trading bloc is NAFTA; NAFTA GDP = $24.8trn, EU GDP = $17.4trn .
And then the actual distortion begins... we have not 'cut off' access to the market, any more than the EU has cut off trade with Japan, the US, Canada, Australia etc.. if you need to resort to distortion and untruth, you haven't got a very strong case.
UK growth is forecast to rise, following the massive spend on CV19 the money set aside for post-Brexit wasn't there, and yet the UK avoided recession while countries in the EU didn't. We certainly had higher than wanted inflation though, but not as high as some countries in the EU.
Anyway, I asked for and have still to receive an answer to a simple question; to make it easier I'll rephrase it: should both sides in this discussion be judged by the same objective standards, or only on terms that they find acceptable?
You're running scared, you haven't answered, and anyone reading through the posts can see that. But prove me wrong, do it 'again' now. And here it is again in easy-to-understand language: should both sides in this discussion be judged by the same objective standards, or only on terms that they find acceptable?
No you didn't, you prevaricated. Here is the question, it isn't a trick or a trap it's a simple value judgement, have another go: should both sides in this discussion be judged by the same objective standards, or only on terms that they find acceptable?
Yes.
Nice try, let's give you another go in even simpler terms, and see if you are brave enough to write that again: should both sides in this discussion be judged by the same objective standards?
#thatsthejoke
This is a forum not a court.
