Defra now looking at capping SFI

Clive

Staff Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lichfield
Modulation or capping makes perfect sense dont you think?
I wonder what Oliver Walston would have made of SFI and value
to the public.

don't see the case for capping it frankly, would be a massive U turn and what they have said re desired uptake and a big set back re UK climate commitments
 

lloyd

Member
Location
Herefordshire
don't see the case for capping it frankly, would be a massive U turn and what they have said re desired uptake and a big set back re UK climate commitments
The case would be an economic one .
There is a large area of grade 3 land area in England especially in the central area
which at first glance looks more profitable in sfi.
So we look for imports to replace production but how stable and reliable will
they be if there is a major weather event in one of the main global producing regions.
Of course it might be a good thing as we would be able to get a realistic price for our outputs.
 
Disagree. I’ve never wanted to make more money than I need to get a modest living. There’s much to life than money. If I’d expanded in this game then all I’d have done is robbed a neighbour of a living. As long as I’ve enough for the groceries and household bills and my bank balance is stable that’s all I ask. You can keep the range rovers and foreign holidays. Does nothing for me.
each to their own, no range rovers here or many foreign holidays but another generation to give a chance to, thats my priority not my neighbours
 
Working at half throttle means you never need to retire esiecially with the schemes on offer. These schemes are better than a pension, rightly or wrongly.
50 acres of birdseed/polinator mix will generate more income than my wife’s pension that she paid into for 30 years.
I can’t think of a better job than farming to keep you in old age. Even carrying on cropping can be done from a telephone. Many of my old contract farming customers worked that way. Wore me out instead!🤣
dont expect the schemes to last long, theres an army of civil servants to get a cut of the budget now, theyre thinking of ways to cut trates already the way the wheat price is going too many will want in
 

DrWazzock

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
Capping rules would be extremely complex and lead to all sorts of stupid inefficiencies. It probably makes more sense to put the whole of a small farm into a scheme than be left with a completely unviable reduced cropping area for example. And a big estate on poor ground is also probably best in a scheme in its entirety. What’s the point of going to all the effort of organising a harvesting team and running a store for 50% of what you grow now? Just my take on it.
 

DrWazzock

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire
dont expect the schemes to last long, theres an army of civil servants to get a cut of the budget now, theyre thinking of ways to cut trates already the way the wheat price is going too many will want in
It’s chicken feed compared to what they are spending on NHS or defence. A big urban vote winner (till food gets dearer which it won’t) and it helps meet the targets they promised at all those high profile summits. If you can compete with Ukraine head to head on grain then go for it. I probably can but schemes are easier and less risk. Now whether it’s actually “right” or not is a different matter.
 
Modulation or capping makes perfect sense dont you think?
I wonder what Oliver Walston would have made of SFI and value
to the public.
the madness is quite simple, pay farmers to reduce the area farmed reducing the supply and then ALSO pay more for you food in the shops....

you can then increase the madness level to insanity by calling it "public money for public goods" even though 95% of the public have no interest or idea of your crop establishment system or wild bird seed plots,

meanwhile China is approving new coal power projects at the equivalent of two plants every week and has 1142 plants running in total
 

lloyd

Member
Location
Herefordshire
the madness is quite simple, pay farmers to reduce the area farmed reducing the supply and then ALSO pay more for you food in the shops....

you can then increase the madness level to insanity by calling it "public money for public goods" even though 95% of the public have no interest or idea of your crop establishment system or wild bird seed plots,

meanwhile China is approving new coal power projects at the equivalent of two plants every week and has 1142 plants running in total
Quite agree the phrase 'Make hay while the sun shines ' couldn't be more apt.
 
Fudgers 🤦‍♂️. All my fields that are adjacent to an SSSI, not in SSSI but adjacent, has to wait for Natural England approval before SFI is signed off, even were the only action applied on a parcel is hedgerow management the opposite side to the SSSI. Whose fudging land is it, ours or Natural England’s 🤨. W⚓️s 🙄
Mine came back saying land is in a SSSi; it is not and the maps clearly show that. I do, like you, farm adjacent to one, which is literally just a standard woodland. Have they emailed you asking for the form from Natural England?
 

hally

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
cumbria
Mine came back saying land is in a SSSi; it is not and the maps clearly show that. I do, like you, farm adjacent to one, which is literally just a standard woodland. Have they emailed you asking for the form from Natural England?
We have some fields bordering a river bank which is an SSI, they have only approved the legume option at 100/ha and not sam3.
 

4course

Member
Location
north yorks
Thanks , yes I have filled a consent form, perhaps I should probably have pre-empted that I would need to do so. Just seems a joke that I need consent from NE to undertake SFI options on my land that isn’t in the SSSI and will not impact the SSSI in any way. Getting consent is a waste of both my time and that of Natural England.
I hope im wrong but I fear you may come to rue getting their consent as it may not be just your time you are wasting .cos whats to stop them withdrawing it later or worse .
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
I don’t blame you at all for doing it, but it’s stagnating the industry and is a form of bed blocking.
Should be like in France where you can’t claim subs when you hit pensionable age maybe ?

Hi, I seem to recall you ceased farming 18 months ago - apologies if I am wrong person. did your land go to a new entrant (a true complete new entrnt) or an existing established business expanding? Just thinking about the bed blocking analogy. Cheers.
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 120 38.8%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 118 38.2%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 42 13.6%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 6 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 18 5.8%

Expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive offer for farmers published

  • 257
  • 1
Expanded Sustainable Farming Incentive offer from July will give the sector a clear path forward and boost farm business resilience.

From: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and The Rt Hon Sir Mark Spencer MP Published21 May 2024

s300_Farmland_with_farmFarmland_with_farmhouse_and_grazing_cattle_in_the_UK_Farm_scene__diversification__grazing__rural__beef_GettyImages-165174232.jpg

Full details of the expanded and improved Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) offer available to farmers from July have been published by the...
Top