Hindsight
Member
- Location
- Lincolnshire
I would be happy with that but I'd have to stop grazing to ensure there was some tussocky grass.
Many won't!
I would be happy with that but I'd have to stop grazing to ensure there was some tussocky grass.
To be honest you can look at the rules and find reasons why you can't do any of the options, in the end I just thought rubbish lets have a go and see what happens, at the end of the day if you want the money that's what you have to do.I would be happy with that but I'd have to stop grazing to ensure there was some tussocky grass.
you can use a feed trough in low inputwhich is what some red trousers told DEFRA about lower yeilds in arable fields , just how much income forgone do i get not being able to use fert or trough feed in my low input grazing ? , prob only carry half the sheep it should ,doubt rates should be very different,
you can use fert as well, just not muchyou can use a feed trough in low input
To be honest you can look at the rules and find reasons why you can't do any of the options, in the end I just thought rubbish lets have a go and see what happens, at the end of the day if you want the money that's what you have to do.
All I will have to do is not top it, which I haven't bothered so much with in recent years anyway.Many won't!
All I will have to do is not top it, which I haven't bothered so much with in recent years anyway.
don't think low input is much good for mowing land though I have just put that in the legumes option as there is some clover about
yep the rules are loose and open to how the inspector sees it on the day, what we have done makes very little odds to our farming with minimal outlay and it comes to a little more than BPS which on our 40 odd HA claimable you can work out.And if worried place the cash in a separate bank account and leave it there for the three years until satisfied will not be asked to return it. And ask accountant to place an accrual in the annual accounts.
its surprising how the different options mount up when you come to add it all up at the endBear in mind I am an arable focussed person so really have not a clue about ruminant livestock and certainly not hill farms - so correct me please if my assumptions are incorrect. I suggest you are competing with equivalent grass farmers drawing SAM3 Herbal ley £383 which does not take land out of production (depending on ones point of view concerning productive capacity versus a Ryegrass Ley?) And grass farmers drawing LIG1 Low Input Grass £151. Those farmers will also presumably draw IPM1, NUM1, SAM1 and SAM1a and Admin Payment. Also if have hedges are eligible for HRW1, 2 & 3. The other two grass options are IGL1 which does take grass out of production totally - payment £380 or so if I recall. And IGL2 £515 hectare which is slightly odd in that it can be use for production but in a restricted way and I consider is intended for predominately Ryegrass Leys/PP. There are a few takers of this option I know of who intend to take one cut Silage and graze with Sheep in following March and we wait to see how that affects production.
I’m on with cattle at the moment but just tot this lot up for me or someone else willHi, you make a good point. And I see Fieldfarmer has addressed this at post 710. But shall we take a look at the competitive SFI income. You provide an interesting personal scenario to debate the subject of relative competitiveness.
Bear in mind I am an arable focussed person so really have not a clue about ruminant livestock and certainly not hill farms - so correct me please if my assumptions are incorrect. I suggest you are competing with equivalent grass farmers drawing SAM3 Herbal ley £383 which does not take land out of production (depending on ones point of view concerning productive capacity versus a Ryegrass Ley?) And grass farmers drawing LIG1 Low Input Grass £151. Those farmers will also presumably draw IPM1, NUM1, SAM1 and SAM1a and Admin Payment. Also if have hedges are eligible for HRW1, 2 & 3. The other two grass options are IGL1 which does take grass out of production totally - payment £380 or so if I recall. And IGL2 £515 hectare which is slightly odd in that it can be use for production but in a restricted way and I consider is intended for predominately Ryegrass Leys/PP. There are a few takers of this option I know of who intend to take one cut Silage and graze with Sheep in following March and we wait to see how that affects production.
The £800 take land out of production payments are for arable land - and as it states take land out of production and thus it cannot be used for utilizable grass, that is except NUM3 which has not been capped and could possibly be used for grass harvest. And cannot be used either for Maize or Cereals which might compete against you in a feeding regime. So these higher payments re they truly providing a competitive advantage against livestock produced on a Hill Grass Farm? The other current Arable options are IPM4 no insecticide (not eligible on Grass), IPM3 Companion crops and SAM2 overwinter cover crops - so only eligible on cropping land - these might confer some financial advantage for the production of arable fodder such as Maize, Cereals, grazing Forage crops which compete with your Cattle and Sheep, but all incur some costs as seeds etc and thus is not totally 'free' money.
So thank you for your observation and 'assertion' of competitive disadvantage as it has made me ponder this subject over my coffee. I have been thinking about this with regard to the farms I visit which are in the main arable and how SFI fits into their businesses. I think the real advantage has so far been to the approach on here we have seen where arable farms are stacking non production options within a production rotation - ie AHL2 following a crop and before a crop or more AHL1/NUM3. This is a clear financial boost.
Will think more about the wider competitive aspects as it affects farms and regions. Cheers.
But it's not "lower yeilds in arable fields " for that payment its zero yeild and around £250 ha in costs to plant , so in your scenario doubting the rate should be very different for the same payment value would it not be zero stocking rate and deduct the costs involved in buying and planting the cover crop.which is what some red trousers told DEFRA about lower yeilds in arable fields , just how much income forgone do i get not being able to use fert or trough feed in my low input grazing ? , prob only carry half the sheep it should ,doubt rates should be very different,
Unless you have 500 hogs on hoppers in every 10 acre field that number would have to be averaged over the holding to give a accurate figure.I’m on with cattle at the moment but just tot this lot up for me or someone else will
An example of a 10 acre field here
500 hoggs in on hoppers @ £150
100 bales of silage @ £25
200 store lambs grazed for 10 weeks @ 50p per week
150 ewes grazed for 6 weeks @ 60p per week
What’s that earned?
really? if thats the case how come there are farmers (and successful ones to ) who have either never had subs or never had much ? who have farmed and still farm.It kept us farming tho we’d all
Be long gone if it wast there
yep we done the pest management one as well can't remember the code, ADDAS done the soil samples and the management plans we just have to pay for the lab work which is more than covered by the soil option in the first year, hedges/trees was the big one for us 7.5 miles of them [single side] [work it out] nice that they are making me a few quid as well as providing shelter.So with £151 LIG1 and £102 NUM2 plus management plans, Admin payment, SAM1a soil organic matter and any hedgerow payment I hazard a guess you are half way or more to previous BPS payment. And of course still going to receive the rump BPS payment in 2024. Some costs against that - for OM lab tests (not a lot) any payment to a rapacious BASiS / FACTS adviser for the plans. And a bit of clover seed if need to overseed for NUM2 -- though you say you have clover already. And then it is a case of whether these change affect your ability to produce as you have - you seem quite sanguine about that. Interesting stuff H. Cheers.
I don't count the management plans etc at all. They either need a 'professional' or a reasonable amount of time to do them/make them up yourself. The only free one for me is hedgerow trees. Even then, on a fully hedged farm, all the hedge options only total a couple of £k. It really is annoying when reading that mixed farm that claw back BPS through hedges - it's just crumbs for peasants.So with £151 LIG1 and £102 NUM2 plus management plans, Admin payment, SAM1a soil organic matter and any hedgerow payment I hazard a guess you are half way or more to previous BPS payment. And of course still going to receive the rump BPS payment in 2024. Some costs against that - for OM lab tests (not a lot) any payment to a rapacious BASiS / FACTS adviser for the plans. And a bit of clover seed if need to overseed for NUM2 -- though you say you have clover already. And then it is a case of whether these change affect your ability to produce as you have - you seem quite sanguine about that. Interesting stuff H. Cheers.
NoUnless you have 500 hogs on hoppers in every 10 acre field that number would have to be averaged over the holding to give an accurate figure.
No idea what that adds up to but I want that field if it can sustain that over a year.I’m on with cattle at the moment but just tot this lot up for me or someone else will
An example of a 10 acre field here
500 hoggs in on hoppers @ £150
100 bales of silage @ £25
200 store lambs grazed for 10 weeks @ 50p per week
150 ewes grazed for 6 weeks @ 60p per week
What’s that earned?
Put some muck and fertiliser on then it willNo idea what that adds up to but I want that field if it can sustain that over a year.
you can get them done for nartI don't count the management plans etc at all. They either need a 'professional' or a reasonable amount of time to do them/make them up yourself.
21%! What's been your highest figure @Clive ?yep we done the pest management one as well can't remember the code, ADDAS done the soil samples and the management plans we just have to pay for the lab work which is more than covered by the soil option in the first year, hedges/trees was the big one for us 7.5 miles of them [single side] [work it out] nice that they are making me a few quid as well as providing shelter.
nice to be being paid at last for doing the right thing environmentally all these years, SOM tests were interesting between 10 and 21 % and this is not peat land, all that lovely carbon locked up