Hilly
Member
- Location
- Scottish Borders.
I agree with you.I’m not so sure.
If you were facing fines and costs of that magnitude then I think you would engage Solicitors who would do more than just plead guilty against a statutory authority.
There is something a bit strange about all of this.
John Price could not plead innocent to the fact that he carried the work out. But there are various elements of the charges he could have pleaded innocent to or guilty, but with mitigating circumstances.
Yet he didn’t! Or he and his team didn’t push it as hard as they could have.
He was quite happy, if not proud to be photographed by the bridge in front of the work he carried out, the river and its banks have recovered and will recover far more so in the near future.
John had a massive sale of machinery, which was undoubtedly to fund his costs and fines he knew would result from the case. Including, you would have thought, hiring a ‘top notch’ legal team.
But something tells me that there is strong likelihood that John deliberately knew that this was likely to happen and it’s like a giant master plan he has had all along.
At 68, he’s hardly likely to end up in a cat1 prison. More likely an open prison from which he will be home each weekend, just like Geoffrey Archer was.
Is it all a plan for John to eventually have the last laugh and show or prove that EA and NE are in fact completely wrong?
Something about it all suggests there is some planning behind this. More so than John just martyring himself.