Yes. Unlike East Middle Weansland of whatever he was called…Nah, hump in his back, and too straight on the hind legs. Milton of North Sir Allen, saw him out of his wool at the AI center, length, level great hams, and he could walk, unlike most. terrible figures though
It’s a bit “let’s talk to them in the language they’ll understand”
It all went wrong with early recording when signet penalised all types of fat , that in turn promoted ultra lean big sheep with growth rates to match , the mule or suff x mule is already a big enough ewe (which was one of the most popular at the time ) , it needed to be tempered with a more moderate sized ram that had some finish at a commercial weight , Its interesting now that imf is sought after as its a high omega 3 source , another trait that was looked down on .
Mind you most commercial farmers will always buy on size , so you cant blame pedigree breeders for continuing the trend that fitted the recording criteria
That’s fine but there’s two issues even with trait focussed selection through EBVs. Not every trait which makes a difference to profitability is measured, and you can’t just move one or two traits. If you do move a trait the others move whether you like it or not.
exactly , law of unintended consequences ! Thats why simply using an overall index is misleading at best , of course individual indexes mean more work for the recorder and doesn't fit with the easy marketing strategy of the big players .That’s fine but there’s two issues even with trait focussed selection through EBVs. Not every trait which makes a difference to profitability is measured, and you can’t just move one or two traits. If you do move a trait the others move whether you like it or not.
Fascinating that the Texel is now following the Romney model you describe, all growth, the need for muscling basically thrown away, a recipe for large lean lambs that won't finish, but you try telling folk that a lamb sold in market has the same ultimate destination as one sold dead, they all end up on a hook. Also try telling a heavy feeding ram breeder that , that system is not particularly profitable for prime lamb production.In our Romney flock the issue 20 years ago were small and fat lambs so once we switched to recorded tups of NZ origin we made sure we went for high growth rate and lean, plus prolificacy.
Well the high growth worked perfectly and you could argue that so did the high lean index but we quickly stopped that route as we ended up with lots of 50 kg plus hoggets that wouldn't finish.
Prolificacy increased more by only using twin replacement all the time than genetics.
The game changer then was to concentrate on more fat cover and eye muscle size which has improved the carcass hugely.
We have been lucky with the Romney in that the ease of lambing has never been an issue.
Had the pleasure of shearing him a few times. At the time he was born there was very little ET work done and he was a natural triplet lamb himself. When John Forsyth bought him for the then record price of 33,000gns at Lanark he got to know that his triplet brother was going to Carlisle the following week. So he went and bought him too at around 4000gns but don’t think he ever actually used him much. The result was anyone wanting lambs off that line in the next couple of years had to buy out his pen and it certainly worked for him especially since Blondin proved to be a great breeder.
What you say is true, but farmers keep buying rams from the trough feeders, otherwise they wouldn't be in business.Also try telling a heavy feeding ram breeder that , that system is not particularly profitable for prime lamb production.
Yes, but he’s wanting to make a profit himself, and there’s no doubt what sells.Fascinating that the Texel is now following the Romney model you describe, all growth, the need for muscling basically thrown away, a recipe for large lean lambs that won't finish, but you try telling folk that a lamb sold in market has the same ultimate destination as one sold dead, they all end up on a hook. Also try telling a heavy feeding ram breeder that , that system is not particularly profitable for prime lamb production.
I suppose what I'm really getting at, is that it's a shame that more attention isn't given too breeding (for example ) a good genetic loin, rather than just making it look like it's got one, but if the buyer is that stupid so be it.Yes, but he’s wanting to make a profit himself, and there’s no doubt what sells.
Yes, but he’s wanting to make a profit himself, and there’s no doubt what sells.
I don’t disagreeI suppose what I'm really getting at, is that it's a shame that more attention isn't given too breeding (for example ) a good genetic loin, rather than just making it look like it's got one, but if the buyer is that stupid so be it.