- Location
- Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk
Thanks for the sharp stick but in my defence I think I've been raising the spectre of raising costs through increasing regulation simply leading to increased imports from places where farm costs are lower due to lighter regulation for a long time now.
There used to be considerable flexibility for example in timing of capital claims under the old CSS and HLS agri-environment agreements. As long as it was in the plan, then if you didn't get something done in one year you could roll it into the next one, subject to an overall completion (or lose the money) within 5 years (and as long as still within the period of your agreement). It can be done!
I don’t agree. I think the ministers will quite happily take the moral ground, whilst exporting any environmental responsibility abroad . I’m all for doing more towards a better environment, but why should we then allow cheap food imports , where welfare and the environment are not seen as a priority.Not a fair comment. Currently we have problems, Gove or no Gove, free market or no free market, regulations or no regulations. Sitting on our hands and taking the Pension Fund top-up is not an option. We have more than enough time to comment, lobby and make a point. As usual, the majority will sit back and whinge from the sidelines !!!
It's time to secure our Children's future - stop whinging and do something !!!
I know exactly what you are saying. We had to request a derogation recently and had to send it to Worcester to people we have never even spoken to. It did at least go across the desk of a proper adviser. We have 2 years left on our HLS and have just be allocated back to an adviser who started us off under CSS 18 years ago. At least he has visited the farm on several occasions, as we may have significant challenges coming up with a bypass probably coming through us!Yes I remember it well. You also used to be able to pop into our local RDS office and discuss things with your advisor over a cup of tea, he or she would know your agreement intimately from application through to mapping and then claim. Our local RDS office is now an engineering/machinery parts sales centre. Carrying out the same task now would involve a road trip to Crewe then Nottingham and then onto Newcastle to speak to three different people - none of whom will have been to your farm or even spoken to you in your life and most likely have no agricultural, ecological or land management experience or knowledge.
They call it it efficiency of delivery, I think it’s a shambles and sadly so do many of the front line staff who seem to be embarrassed by the whole sorry mess.
Should’ve come to Cornwall NFU management meeting last night. The stick is getting sharper and being sharpened as we speak. Time for some real reality checks with Mr Gove
AHDB and NFU got s bit of a kicking at the TFA meeting. TFA get an income of half a million a year , compared to NFU £25 million and AHDB £65 million, yet TFA seem to do more lobbying and meetings with ministers .Well well well what a turn of events...............................................
For the last 3/4/5 years you @An Gof have openly sneered at people like me who have said time and time again that the NFU need to take a much tougher line with the government and fight much harder for their members.
NFU will NEVER listen to grassroots members and GS reply's on here show that..
................................
Oh and just in case you don't get the FG, well in the letters page there is a letter from the AHDB's chief communications office @ Christine Watts openly telling the biggest porkie ever that the AHDB are NOT allowed to advertise UK produce as from the UK.............
Well well well what a turn of events...............................................
For the last 3/4/5 years you @An Gof have openly sneered at people like me who have said time and time again that the NFU need to take a much tougher line with the government and fight much harder for their members.
NFU will NEVER listen to grassroots members and GS reply's on here show that..
................................
Oh and just in case you don't get the FG, well in the letters page there is a letter from the AHDB's chief communications office @ Christine Watts openly telling the biggest porkie ever that the AHDB are NOT allowed to advertise UK produce as from the UK.............
i noticed this....but point scoring isn't nice.....i'm liking an gof's posting just now
AHDB and NFU got s bit of a kicking at the TFA meeting. TFA get an income of half a million a year , compared to NFU £25 million and AHDB £65 million, yet TFA seem to do more lobbying and meetings with ministers .
The opinion of grass roots members is pretty broad though isn’t it? And will vary from branch to branch.NFU carry out lobbying but the problem is that Stoneleigh HQ don't listen to grass roots members on issues before they lobby but instead listen to a few select large farmers/ under qualified staff ( ie staff that are too young/ just out of Uni etc who don't have any experience of the issues they are giving advice on ) and lobby on their viewpoints alone.
NFU carry out lobbying but the problem is that Stoneleigh HQ don't listen to grass roots members on issues before they lobby but instead listen to a few select large farmers
grass roots members
Excellent post, there is the same danger with the new enviromental standards and food production as there has been with plastic recycling. Such high standards here that no one can afford to do it and the problem is exported. We meet the standards and the planet suffers.I don’t agree. I think the ministers will quite happily take the moral ground, whilst exporting any environmental responsibility abroad . I’m all for doing more towards a better environment, but why should we then allow cheap food imports , where welfare and the environment are not seen as a priority.
Time for the public to dig deep and pay for quality standards, rather than double standards .
Export the problemExcellent post, there is the same danger with the new enviromental standards and food production as there has been with plastic recycling. Such high standards here that no one can afford to do it and the problem is exported. We meet the standards and the planet suffers.
Classic case of the law of unexpected consequences, just like fence stakes and creosote!
Excellent post, there is the same danger with the new enviromental standards and food production as there has been with plastic recycling. Such high standards here that no one can afford to do it and the problem is exported. We meet the standards and the planet suffers.
Classic case of the law of unexpected consequences, just like fence stakes and creosote!
However, in this case all we will be doing is catching up with others..........
http://cphpost.dk/news/business/den...issions-by-24-percent-proves-unrealistic.html