This example is now in the public domain so easier for me to talk about it.
A government body has served many local with the above relating to the need to complete wildlife surveys in a few weeks time. We are alll seeking clarity on where we stand.
From what I can learn this act is used when projects of national importance need to progress and they thus have the right to bully their way on to land in connection with the project. I suspect HS2 saw this new act a lot. This is normally linked to pre commencement tests / bore holes / surveys with the ultimate aim to compulsory purchase the land.
The body is supposed to use this as a last resort after traditional friendly methods of communication have failed.
In this example, this is the first contact from them, straight in with the boxing gloves! Also, as they don’t appear, at the moment, interested in CC the land I have been advised that they can’t use this section of law. The project is also not of national importance.
Has anyone else come across this before and had any luck deferring it? It was sent from Lawyers in London who I will ring tomorrow. Based on their style so far, it would not surprise me if they are in the wrong but just trying to throw their weight around in the hope the locals will back down.
I didn’t have plans to pick a fight with such people this week but from what I am hearing so far it may be a simple response.
Any other feedback welcome!
A government body has served many local with the above relating to the need to complete wildlife surveys in a few weeks time. We are alll seeking clarity on where we stand.
From what I can learn this act is used when projects of national importance need to progress and they thus have the right to bully their way on to land in connection with the project. I suspect HS2 saw this new act a lot. This is normally linked to pre commencement tests / bore holes / surveys with the ultimate aim to compulsory purchase the land.
The body is supposed to use this as a last resort after traditional friendly methods of communication have failed.
In this example, this is the first contact from them, straight in with the boxing gloves! Also, as they don’t appear, at the moment, interested in CC the land I have been advised that they can’t use this section of law. The project is also not of national importance.
Has anyone else come across this before and had any luck deferring it? It was sent from Lawyers in London who I will ring tomorrow. Based on their style so far, it would not surprise me if they are in the wrong but just trying to throw their weight around in the hope the locals will back down.
I didn’t have plans to pick a fight with such people this week but from what I am hearing so far it may be a simple response.
Any other feedback welcome!