- Location
- S. Staffs
This is reported in the daily wail today, got to be good news?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And divert as much as possible to park maintenance, mowing verges, HS2 tree planting etcThat doesn't mean that BPS will continue as now for another 5 years though. They are only committing to keep the overall budget the same, so it could quite well (and probably would) be spent differently. Less or maybe nothing on universal area payments, more on Greening and 'Public Goods', as has been mentioned before.
I'd have a guess that they'd pick a set of base years, give everyone claiming in those years a pro rata BPS payment regardless of whether they continue farming or not, but taper those payments down to zero over 3 or 4 years. Thus freeing up all the civil servants to work on the new schemes as no annual BPS applications would be needed.
And divert as much as possible to park maintenance, mowing verges, HS2 tree planting etc
[/Q
as long as we can survive on the farm, i'll go for any payments, greening, conservation, woodland, etc, this round nearly 1km of hedges, and double fence.
The problem with the schemes is when the turn round and say you cannot do something with the farm 5yrs later. There seems to be a few cases on here, so I would rather paddle my own canoe than join them.
Boris made a promise ??
And divert as much as possible to park maintenance, mowing verges, HS2 tree planting etc
I'd have a guess that they'd pick a set of base years, give everyone claiming in those years a pro rata BPS payment regardless of whether they continue farming or not, but taper those payments down to zero over 3 or 4 years. Thus freeing up all the civil servants to work on the new schemes as no annual BPS applications would be needed.
I'd have a guess that they'd pick a set of base years, give everyone claiming in those years a pro rata BPS payment regardless of whether they continue farming or not, but taper those payments down to zero over 3 or 4 years. Thus freeing up all the civil servants to work on the new schemes as no annual BPS applications would be needed.
I think there is a big ( IF ) missing
I