SilliamWhale
Member
Do you mean in ten years time or from what I paid for it .
10 years
Do you mean in ten years time or from what I paid for it .
Interesting thought , but not sure I agree10 years
Ah, see what you meanLooking at second hand combines there seems to be a whole lot more rotary combines about, especially large ones.
But the new one would be a huge lot more again!10 years
Another blue one .
Sell the roller, splash out on a few lovely holidays - I'm thinking Maldives water bungalow - ; get a much more reasonably priced roller, albeit smaller, and spend EVEN LONGER doing your most FAVOURITE job.
I'm no financial advisor but I'm pretty sure that would be a good plan.
You cannot lose man
But surely is psychological. Changing a machine every 9 years vs every 3 is not going to cost you any more over the 9 year period. Ok tax efficiency may come into it but not always.Whilst I agree with all the posts about buying a machine and keeping it for 10years, the problem becomes the cost to change. We are reluctant to keep machines too long because its incredible how quickly they become out of reach.
Rightly or wrongly we changed our mainline 300hptractor this year. 3 years old 2500hours absolute beauty nothing at all wrong with it BUT the cost to change like for like was £80k!! That gap is growing every year and if we don't change now it will be £100/k+ in 2 years. Same with combine. Reluctant to change but if we don't within a year or two we will be unachievable. Its the treadmill of machinery. If you get off it its incredibly difficult to get back on.
I’ve still got the Deutz as my smaller tractor . They just couldn’t come anywhere near the deal to change the bigger one, blue for blue.Did you not get to gel with the TTV?
I got past the awkward stage and really like it now. Mind, for me it helps the dealer just being a couple of miles away, alternative brands all being a lot further
Absolutely, and my old 10 year old combines depreciation flattened out over the last 3 years, it was as cost effective and reliable as it was in the previous 7But surely is psychological. Changing a machine every 9 years vs every 3 is not going to cost you any more over the 9 year period. Ok tax efficiency may come into it but not always.
Yes, but you might have enough money in the bank to replace all the lot. My three most used machines are all over 10 000 hours and I know one will let me down soon or cost a few £ but atm are still going well and getting good value for money out of them.If farmers don’t replace some machines reguLarry there will come a time when you end up with a yard full of worn out knackered machinery.i know of a contractor already experiencing this scenario and I expect there are plenty of others.
nick...
But the new one would be a huge lot more again!
Perhaps but if I don't change my combine for 10years I'm not sure I will be able to change it again for a new one. Cost to change in 2026 would likely be £250,000+ atbthe current rate. Then I would need to get a loan out over 10 years and probably cost me the same per year as it would of done if I had changed at 5 yearsBut surely is psychological. Changing a machine every 9 years vs every 3 is not going to cost you any more over the 9 year period. Ok tax efficiency may come into it but not always.
Sorry I still don’t understand. If you don’t change your combine after 5 years do you lose the money you were going to spend changing it? Are you not allowed to keep that money somewhere for another 5 years or use that money to make more money as opposed to depreciating in an asset?Perhaps but if I don't change my combine for 10years I'm not sure I will be able to change it again for a new one. Cost to change in 2026 would likely be £250,000+ atbthe current rate. Then I would need to get a loan out over 10 years and probably cost me the same per year as it would of done if I had changed at 5 years