Do cover crops actually help suppress weeds?

I did a bit of reading to try to find evidence to back up the idea that by growing a cover crop and creating a mulch which suppresses weed one could reduce or eliminate herbicide usage. One paper suggested that their cover crop mulch reduced weed numbers by 78% but had no effect on total weed biomass (i.e. each weed has less competition and so grew more vigorously). If one was using herbicides then this last finding might be useful. Reducing the density is useful because there are simply less individual weeds to kill, although perhaps if each is more vigorous the efficacity of the spray might be reduced.

So the question is whether it is a naive hope that cover crops can make huge inroads in reducing herbicide usage? Rather might they simply be one extra tool in a very large toolchest which is required to stay on top of problem weeds?

For:

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4 ... 1634365323
http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/searc ... ;US9745251

Against:

http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/con ... /410.short
http://www.wssajournals.org/doi/abs/10. ... 2.0.CO%3B2
http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... 10?LI=true
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/3 ... 1634365323

Thoughts and experiences please!
 

martian

DD Moderator
BASE UK Member
Location
N Herts
Not more homework! I haven't finished Hands on Agronomy yet...
Rather lost the thread on the second 'against' paper (the wssajournal one) when they said they were harvesting 4.3 Million tonnes of biomass per hectare. Some cover!
 
Take this paper:

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4 ... 1634365323

It makes me wonder, if the cover crop is good at suppressing weeds, is it also good at suppressing the cash crop as well?!

Rye, for example, has allelopathic effects on weeds but there is also some evidence which suggests it does the same on the cash crop. Is it possible to somehow get the best of both worlds? I'm not so sure.

Cross slot boasts that it retains the cover over the seed row but might it not be better to actually give the cash crop some space so that it can actually grow?
 

BSH

Member
BASE UK Member
I would have thought that there was quite a lot of evidence of organic growers using mulchs to cover weeds and let crops get away to say that it definately works. It does though I imagine work best with crops that are large seeded and rapid gowing that subsequently provide shading or their own allelopathic influence on the weeds when they come throught the mulch. So Pumpkins and maize work well. I think a cover crop of many species will help to reduce weeds by out competing them as well. Certainly that is my experience of using complex herbal leys in an organic situation.
 

Make Tax Digital Software Poll

  • Quickbooks

    Votes: 27 18.1%
  • Sage

    Votes: 13 8.7%
  • Xero

    Votes: 65 43.6%
  • Other

    Votes: 44 29.5%

Five nature-recovery projects spanning 100,000ha launched

  • 105
  • 1
Written by Michelle Martin from Agriland

Image-source-Savills-field-640x360.jpg
Five nature-recovery projects spanning nearly 100,000ha across the West Midlands, Cambridgeshire, the Peak District, Norfolk and Somerset have been announced by the government and Natural England today (Thursday, May 26).

This is the equivalent in size to all 219 current National Reserves.

The aim of the projects is to deliver nature recovery at a landscape scale, helping to tackle biodiversity loss, climate change and improve public health and well-being.

All five projects will make a significant contribution towards the national delivery of the international commitment to protect at least 30% of land and...
Top