But had he done his mass balance?
Bg
Customer yesterday had a fail on his ACCS because his scrap heap was to untidy and has 28 days to sort it out or be suspended. It’s nowhere near the grain store
It’s getting silly now
I’d love to see that “non-conformance” in writing…..that’s just petty.
As the customer drives down the road consuming their burger made with imported beef and wheat to throw the packaging out of the window!I have a similar non conformance in writing from the NI Farm Quality Assurance body.
I took a shed down at Christmas. Took one load of scrap to the merchants. Had another load sitting on the trailer during the inspection two weeks ago and a pile waiting to be put on as a third load.
The inspector asked to see the scrap merchants receipt. I did not have it to hand (my wife had the envelop somewhere and the £277!) so got a non conformance to produce the receipt.
The actual wording of the non conformance is "Disused tin stored around yard". The rectification required is "Photographs of action taken or a receipt for materials purchased / work carried out".
It is down as a breach of rule 7.1 - Environmental Care - "The producer must adopt a positive attitude towards the countryside ... prevent pollution of the environment ... expect producers, as guardians of the countryside, to ensure that it is cared for".
I have a similar non conformance in writing from the NI Farm Quality Assurance body.
I took a shed down at Christmas. Took one load of scrap to the merchants. Had another load sitting on the trailer during the inspection two weeks ago and a pile waiting to be put on as a third load.
The inspector asked to see the scrap merchants receipt. I did not have it to hand (my wife had the envelop somewhere and the £277!) so got a non conformance to produce the receipt.
The actual wording of the non conformance is "Disused tin stored around yard". The rectification required is "Photographs of action taken or a receipt for materials purchased / work carried out".
It is down as a breach of rule 7.1 - Environmental Care - "The producer must adopt a positive attitude towards the countryside ... prevent pollution of the environment ... expect producers, as guardians of the countryside, to ensure that it is cared for".
I would send a photo of the receipt (assuming you've found it now) and put a formal complaint in as it sounds like a complete misrepresentation of the situation.I have a similar non conformance in writing from the NI Farm Quality Assurance body.
I took a shed down at Christmas. Took one load of scrap to the merchants. Had another load sitting on the trailer during the inspection two weeks ago and a pile waiting to be put on as a third load.
The inspector asked to see the scrap merchants receipt. I did not have it to hand (my wife had the envelop somewhere and the £277!) so got a non conformance to produce the receipt.
The actual wording of the non conformance is "Disused tin stored around yard". The rectification required is "Photographs of action taken or a receipt for materials purchased / work carried out".
It is down as a breach of rule 7.1 - Environmental Care - "The producer must adopt a positive attitude towards the countryside ... prevent pollution of the environment ... expect producers, as guardians of the countryside, to ensure that it is cared for".
I'm not sure that RT have a formal appeals process.............. AFAIK there is also no independent route to go down which means you r business can be closed down effectively at the whim of an over zealous inspector.I would send a photo of the receipt (assuming you've found it now) and put a formal complaint in as it sounds like a complete misrepresentation of the situation.
Did you complain?!non conformance from a few years back
"DP.a.1 farm gives poor impression, build up of scrap around grain stores."
I was quite disappointed, although they're not pretty, two trolley augers and a PTO generator aren't scrap in my eyes.
edited for youI'm not sure that RT have a formal appeals process.............. AFAIK they don't give a f**k which means you r business can be closed down effectively at the whim of an over zealous inspector.
An inspector was discussing this with me last year, he had failed a farmer for a clear breach of the rules. The farmer accepted this and held hands up as an error and had rectified the non conformance to the inspector's satisfaction. However RT refused to readmit him, saying insufficient evidence of rectification, when pressed wouldn't say what sufficient was. The inspector himself was embarrassed and angry. The whole thing becomes more and more farcical by the day.