Yep, devoted to the job.. He'd call in once a month for a cuppa and a catch up, Don't see any salesmen nowadays... thats probably a good thing with the price of tack
The entire point of multi power is that you can change down whilst pulling uphillWe have 2 Multi Power 500s here. Great for what we need but the actual Multi Power has to be the worst clutchless splitter of its generation. Dual Power, Power Synchron, Torque Amplifier at aĺ don't have the nonsense of running away in low but then braking in reverse high to the extent you have to knock it down into low to get it out of gear. Who thought that was a good idea?
The entire point of multi power is that you can change down whilst pulling uphill
Yes there are other better splitter gears around but they were not available in the early 60s
I have 3 tractors with multi power and have never had any problems driving any of them
Absolutely lethal tractor on hilly ground with inexperienced driver having to change into higher gear going down hill especially with forager and trailer on behind was crazy and in some models no decent brakes or Pto engagement As for buck raking in silage not easy changing gear in high v much overratedWe have 2 Multi Power 500s here. Great for what we need but the actual Multi Power has to be the worst clutchless splitter of its generation. Dual Power, Power Synchron, Torque Amplifier at aĺ don't have the nonsense of running away in low but then braking in reverse high to the extent you have to knock it down into low to get it out of gear. Who thought that was a good idea?
But none of the other splitters were available in 1963 were they ?You can change down up hill with the others though? We don't have a problem driving them but you have to point out to any new driver the "idiosyncrasies".
Granted. I just bridled at your assertion that the only thing wrong with it is the driver.But none of the other splitters were available in 1963 were they ?
Cant complain about the 600 series here. Although some did rot like snow off the ditch.
Keep them in doors
Is that the xl cab you meanDeutz M620- unreliable, uncomfortable, awkward to use, gutless and would spin on a banana skin.
John Deere 6140R- Gutless, awkward numb big thing. Poor visibility.
Case 85/95 series- nothing wrong with the tractors as such but I hate the left hand gear sticks, awkward driving position and the big b pillar on the cab
i used to own a c385 ursus i found it ok reliable would pull like hell just a shame the fan in the cab only made a noise after the leyland 344 we had before it was a dream that was the worse tractor i have ever owned by a long way the squark of the clutch pedal when depressed the ball ends that fell out the top link that kept shredding the thread on the nut in the middle had to have a new engine because of inter bridge cracking the pto that had to be modified so it didnt jump out of gear no power steering heavy as hell i could go on but life is too short oh i forgot the brakes they were sh!t or bust when it was new then bloody awfulI drove a URSUS 385 same as the ZETOR 8011 for a while. Not a nice machine at all
Yea the XL cabIs that the xl cab you mean
I though they a great cab great access plenty of room and comfortableYea the XL cab
i liked mine nipy powerful manouvrable cab wasnt to bad junior swapped it in for an mx boo woo great big unreliable pile of shite that was how they can take a first rate reliable tractor (maxum) and turn it in to that i dont knowI though they a great cab great access plenty of room and comfortable