The problem is those who walk them when they pick up your equipment and throw into crop just before harvestThe problem is notthose who walk them ,it's those that govern them
Totally Dictatorial
One small example
Right of way going across your back lawn where your yoing kids play every day
Quite happy to provide a path outside of the lawn at my own expense. The short distance about the same , after a long battle it was reluctantly decided I could move at it the cost of over £2000
I do wonder that some members of the public are either consciously or subconsciously , “Left Wing” and begrudge farmers owning land. To me “Lefties” think along the lines “what’s yours is mine, what’s mine is my own”.
Signage responsibility lies with your local council, you need to inform them, not the person who happens to own the land adjacent to the footpath.I am a walker and tbh, I find the prows a disgrace on farmland. I don’t like to trespass but am constantly finding them overgrown in the summer, no direct/ flattened path on crop fields and hidden or no way marks at all.
One farmer informed me I shouldn’t be walking on this area of his land, I answered him calmly and politely…….That there was no P Footpath signage, the route across the field was completely inaccessible and that the only way through was to walk round the edge of his field. Basically sort it out of I will have no other choice than to walk this route.
That's exactly why most farms around here have footpaths through the yardsSignage responsibility lies with your local council, you need to inform them, not the person who happens to own the land adjacent to the footpath.
There needs to be a rationalisation of the footpath system, where, it is possible to easily re route them to better suit both walkers and landowners. I believe the ramblers association automatically oppose any application to alter an existing footpath, which makes the whole thing very expensive (and uncertain).
And, if we are talking about ramblers, footpaths were originally for getting from A to B, not exercising dogs, or hanging bags of dog excrement on fences or trees.
Are you south of the A12?Mmm i fulfill all my obligations, i would say 50% of the public do the same.
Council guide doesn't mention dogs which is unhelpful
I live quite close to Cirencester park . One of the problems now is that it’s become a real tourist attraction, so needs more up keep and sadly more litter to be picked up.I watch a young couple on Youtube who make local history videos about old railways, canals, Roman Roads, etc, and they are mostly enjoyable but they get a real bee in their bonnet about land ownership. A recent video explained how ludicrous it was that since the areas of Public Access Land had been created, there was not always an automatic right of way to get to it.
The idea seemed to be that farmers should provide styles, safe footpaths, etc for the one afternoon a year that Paul and Rebecca might want to go there for a look. They often argue that since farmers all get "Tax subsidies (???)"then everyone should have a right to roam where they like at our expense.
This week they made a film about Cirencester Park, which has been free to access for 300 years but the owners have decided to bring in a one off £10 ticket scheme for locals, which is returnable on handing back the ticket, to enable restoration of the Grade 1 park. The hateful comments from the leftie mob have to be seen to be believed. The 300 years they had it for free seem to have gone completely un-noticed but as dad said, "No good deed goes unpunished."
It’s not trespassThat's trespassing.
It's your responsibility to know where the path is.
Not the farmer's.
If there is crop blocking the path then complain to the council, who will get straight on to farmer.
If it is overgrown with non crop vegetation then that is the council's responsibility.
not going to 'like' but I agree with you.It’s not trespass
You can take an alternative route to bypass an obstruction on a ROW
Perfectly legal to take a diversion to get around
I know - but that precedent is set, to divert (in as short a distance as is practical) around any overgrown/obstructed ROW including Bridleways/BOATS and Byways/unmetalled roadsnot going to 'like' but I agree with you.
YesAre you south of the A12?
Could not be worse.
or around fields of livestock too I believe.I know - but that precedent is set, to divert (in as short a distance as is practical) around any overgrown/obstructed ROW including Bridleways/BOATS and Byways/unmetalled roads
Trueor around fields of livestock too I believe.
I'd rather people walked around cattle than felt afraid.
walk softly and carry a big stick.