That's what happens when everything is just left to nature !I hear some 'blocking' is due to growth of brambles.
you wicked selfish wealthy landowners....deliberately sowing brambles to block RoW
That's what happens when everything is just left to nature !I hear some 'blocking' is due to growth of brambles.
you wicked selfish wealthy landowners....deliberately sowing brambles to block RoW
Aka - "rewilding"!I hear some 'blocking' is due to growth of brambles.
That was one of Tim's favourite picturesThe dream.
View attachment 1158056
most definitelyWould they class overgrown as blocked
There are miles of overgrown around here, lot on common groundmost definitely
Overgrown vegetation; landowners are responsible for cutting back hedges, trees or shrubs overhanging a public right of way. Surface vegetation on rights of way i.e. undergrowth such as nettles and brambles, is the responsibility of the council.I hear some 'blocking' is due to growth of brambles.
you wicked selfish wealthy landowners....deliberately sowing brambles to block RoW
Permission for a sand and gravel locally was blocked on the grounds that it would merely spoil the view from a RoW. Permission for a conservatory on the back of a house near a RoW was blocked because the ramblers complained it spoiled the view. Occupier had to tear it down. Same has happened with phone masts, solar panels etc. The subjective sensitivities of a rambler passing once in a while overrules the needs of landowners and residents as far as West Lindsey DC is concerned.BBC News report on this had a couple of people walking a path in the Tamar Valley (probably NT land) It was a path in a heavily wooded area and the Rambler said "As you can see this is blocked" -and it was, by about 10 years growth of undergrowth and saplings.
Clearly not be walked (certainly not regularly) for many years. So if it's not in use, why maintain it or keep it open? Many tarmaced Council roads around here haven't been maintained in any way for many, many years.
Some people/organisations seem determined to keep RoW's "open" no matter how pointless they are. But has anyone ever successfully challenged building development on the basis that it would block a RoW?
Exactly but if you were a serious criminal they wouldn't go near youIf I was to block anything here the police and council would come down harder on me than John cooper
be the 1 that gives the abuse!!If you've got good well maintained footpaths, walkers seem to want to roam everywhere else but on the proper route, normally through long grass / growing crops and they will even lay wooden planks across ditches when it suits them .If you go across to advise where they should be you end up getting abuse.
I think the local council maintains a definitive map, all footpaths will be on that. I think these were put together in the 50's, and community councils were asked their opinions.Are the presence/rights of way of a public footpath documented on land registry title deeds or would it be the local authority maps that would be regarded as definitive?
Reason I ask is there's a small wooden gate on the boundary of one of our fields that has a 'footpath look' to it, which I'd like to change if possible to one which is not so welcoming looking to Joe Public.
Hunting gate ?Are the presence/rights of way of a public footpath documented on land registry title deeds or would it be the local authority maps that would be regarded as definitive?
Reason I ask is there's a small wooden gate on the boundary of one of our fields that has a 'footpath look' to it, which I'd like to change if possible to one which is not so welcoming looking to Joe Public.
I wouldn't have thought so but you could be right. It was already there when we bought the place and I'm not aware of the previous owner and neighbour having a need for access.Hunting gate ?