- Location
- Derbyshire
TB is awful and is terribly traumatic for farmers who are affected by it but lets put it in perspective, more animals are culled for other reasons other than TB - and these are not compensated for.
Perhaps TB is alarming because it seems like we have no effective way of controlling it and the Government are pumping millions into eradicating it, to no real avail. All of this funding is at the expense of funding for other diseases like BVD, Johne's or even lameness - where the industry must support itself.
I am afraid I don't buy the OPs post. The information is available from AHDB but I am sure somebody ringing up specifically to ask about livestock deaths, calf death at calving would ring alarm bells.
The fact is, sometimes animals do die and they certainly get ill but it is how this is dealt with on farm that is important. Farmers have a massive responsibility. We have the ability to humanely euthanize animals when welfare is being compromised and this is one of the single most significant benefits to welfare that can be provided on livestock farms. Sounds odd... kill something to improve welfare. The fact is that no farmers (none that I have met anyway) are happy with doing this. An activist may suggest this is down to economics and there is a bit of that to be fair BUT it is more than that - there is a personal point, one that points the finger at oneself and scutinises whether you could have done more. This is why many farmers would not be comfortable answering questions about how many animals die or are euthanized on farm. Believe me, it will be a minority of farm populations otherwise the economics simply wouldn't stack up. As humans we know if our own welfare is being severely compromised and we can't even choose to be euthanized... and they think livestock farmers are barbaric!
Perhaps TB is alarming because it seems like we have no effective way of controlling it and the Government are pumping millions into eradicating it, to no real avail. All of this funding is at the expense of funding for other diseases like BVD, Johne's or even lameness - where the industry must support itself.
I am afraid I don't buy the OPs post. The information is available from AHDB but I am sure somebody ringing up specifically to ask about livestock deaths, calf death at calving would ring alarm bells.
The fact is, sometimes animals do die and they certainly get ill but it is how this is dealt with on farm that is important. Farmers have a massive responsibility. We have the ability to humanely euthanize animals when welfare is being compromised and this is one of the single most significant benefits to welfare that can be provided on livestock farms. Sounds odd... kill something to improve welfare. The fact is that no farmers (none that I have met anyway) are happy with doing this. An activist may suggest this is down to economics and there is a bit of that to be fair BUT it is more than that - there is a personal point, one that points the finger at oneself and scutinises whether you could have done more. This is why many farmers would not be comfortable answering questions about how many animals die or are euthanized on farm. Believe me, it will be a minority of farm populations otherwise the economics simply wouldn't stack up. As humans we know if our own welfare is being severely compromised and we can't even choose to be euthanized... and they think livestock farmers are barbaric!