How do you know that?Is he selling the stuff to prevent the bailiffs taking it to pay fine
Probably a lot of it isn’t paid for
Ivor has had a lot of experience with bailiffs and evictions so must know a thing or twoyes but @Kevtherev @startinghandle is talking rubbish because if it hasnt been paid for the bailiffs cant touch it. you would think a man of his endless knowledge would know that
Led to believe the case is rumbling on until april now. Fw running a story but i havent been and bought it yetMaybe Mr Price is selling all that kit to buy diggers and bulldozers for ditch and river dredging jobs as he has shown that he can get the job done efficiently and make it work again. Does anyone actually know what the status is with the alleged court case? Genuinely interested as there sure was a lot of local support I recall for his work on the river it would be a shame if this was all empty words as soon as legal action started. I am in full support of his actions at no cost to anyone as I understood it, sorted out the job in the correct manner, is there lots of rain there now? And is river flowing or flooding
just remember ,about a man and his brother who got thrown off their farmer ,for dilapidationI don’t want it removed… if someone wants
It removed go ahead
Is he selling the stuff to prevent the bailiffs taking it to pay fine
Probably a lot of it isn’t paid for
Well that’s too much like common sense so will never happenDon't know circumstances of sale, and I wouldn't comment on it.
All I know is lack of EA river maintenance is a disgrace, and they should leave the man alone. He did a cracking job. If you don't keep taking insides if corners off it pushes water to erode far bank, causing bigger meanders and more soil/phosphate erosion, and eventually would take the bridge out in those photos.
Mr Price needs to be put in charge of waterways as he seems to know far more about how to make them work efficiently than the EA do.Maybe Mr Price is selling all that kit to buy diggers and bulldozers for ditch and river dredging jobs as he has shown that he can get the job done efficiently and make it work again. Does anyone actually know what the status is with the alleged court case? Genuinely interested as there sure was a lot of local support I recall for his work on the river it would be a shame if this was all empty words as soon as legal action started. I am in full support of his actions at no cost to anyone as I understood it, sorted out the job in the correct manner, is there lots of rain there now? And is river flowing or flooding
Will be all grassed over, looking fine now and water flowing squarely through centre of bridge.Mr Price needs to be put in charge of waterways as he seems to know far more about how to make them work efficiently than the EA do.
Fining him for fixing a problem is just plain stupid, he should be on the payroll at an executive level. If the judge has any sense he will fine the EA for wasting court time.
he done a better job than any feckin badger's!Don't know circumstances of sale, and I wouldn't comment on it.
All I know is lack of EA river maintenance is a disgrace, and they should leave the man alone. He did a cracking job. If you don't keep taking insides if corners off it pushes water to erode far bank, causing bigger meanders and more soil/phosphate erosion, and eventually would take the bridge out in those photos.
Insurance companies be happy as well as no flood damage payouts.Will be all grassed over, looking fine now and water flowing squarely through centre of bridge.
Somebody with enough cash and a team of lawyers could make EA look a bit sillyInsurance companies be happy as well as no flood damage payouts.
in fact I dunno why the insurance companies don’t gang up on the EA
Yep and I bet pictures of it will never be shown. It’s a scandle and shows what a sh!t show this country is.Will be all grassed over, looking fine now and water flowing squarely through centre of bridge.