This one is almost useful:
Using the impact share figures from Monday's IPPC AR6 report global methane emissions in the last decade break down like this:
View attachment 979289
Fossil fuels released as much methane as ruminants did and have been under reporting this for years.
Landfills are a pretty big deal on it as well. At least we get food in return for the ruminant emissions, we get nothing for the landfill ones.
The easiest methane emissions to tackle are actually the coal, oil and gas ones (stop mains leaks, stop or capture leaks at wells) and the landfill ones (collect it and use for heating).
The report also states that the major issue is from rising methane emissions and these are in Asia, The Americas and Eastern Europe.
Finally, and critically, it states that cutting methane emissions will only buy time (around 11 years) to get on with DEEP AND PERMANENT cuts in carbon dioxide emissions in all countries and that doing one without the other will be pointless.
Ruminant methane is a very small part of the problem, blown out of all proportion because it suits everyone else's narrative.
Have you got any links to published evidence on the methane emissions variability within species? It would be very useful to have.
Asked this on another thread where that graph appeared, will ask again as it's bugging me:
if 'wild animals' are 0%, how can 'enteric fermentation and manure' be 15% ? Are buffalo, antelopes etc designed different from cows ?