Care to give us the reg no. of it,if available?A mate of mine, in the next village, has 3 (maybe 4?) now.
He's desperately looking for the one he had in the 70's but not had any success yet.
Care to give us the reg no. of it,if available?A mate of mine, in the next village, has 3 (maybe 4?) now.
He's desperately looking for the one he had in the 70's but not had any success yet.
Next time I see him, I'll ask him what it was.Care to give us the reg no. of it,if available?
A Muir hill is a lot more effecient to the wheels than a county. The county has no less than 5 90 degree Bevel gears to the ground where as a Muir hill has only 2. 90 degree drives are not very efficient. They were refering to PTO efficiency where the county is a bit more effecient where as the Muir hill PTO has a couple of idler gears to drop down throughIn an issue of the Classic Tractor in the early 2000s I recall reading the Muir Hill hp efficency dropped considerably from crankshaft to wheels compared to say a County. Possibly blaming the transfer box but I forget. Last century, the rule of thumb was 50% for pre-CVT hp loss.
I'm pretty sure one of them was ours. Probably the one with the white wheels.Somewhere in North Lincolnshire I’m led to believe.
View attachment 1166364
A shakerator is easy to pull, thatsthe ehole ideaWere Muir Hills especially good?
They were before my time, but someone has sent me some late 70s and early 80s photos of the farm.
One shows a MH 121 is pulling a 9 leg shakearator up a mediumly serious hill, with the frame basically at ground level. This is on heavy ground, which in latter years took 390hp to pull a 3m solo and press.
Just interesting really. So much for progress!
Bring back straw burning any day, no trash, no slugs or blackgrass!3rd picture, good stubble burn, with trees that got a little warm,
What would a Muir Hill with this style cab be worth, was always kept in a shed but been lying out this past 4 years