New limits to SFI.

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
I don't often disagree with you, but I am absolutely convinced that the reduction in BPS has, is and will increase food prices.

I don't think you can over-estimate the impact on the psyche of farmers of having the safety net and support of their pre- christmas cheque, reduced and removed.

I consider it one, if not the only positive thing, that farmers will now be forced to consider production entirely on financial merit.
Returns have to substantially increase to maintain production.
I think/ hope that the nature of having to 'earn' SFI payments will prevent it being used to subsidise production the way BPS and its forerunners did.
In the government’s Health & Harmony report, issued following the 2018 round of consultation meetings which farmers were invited to attend to give their views, increased farmgate prices resulting from a change in payment system was envisaged. So while maybe appearing to disagree I appreciate there may be some impact but my comment is in my view most of the inflationary rise in food prices is due to additional costs in the past three years after the raw material leaves the farmgate.
 
Just had another sfi meeting today one of the biggest grassland payments appear to be for land which grows absolute rubbish. Anyone who has spent money improving land can’t get this. Basically the sfi goes against production
 

Jackov Altraids

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
In the government’s Health & Harmony report, issued following the 2018 round of consultation meetings which farmers were invited to attend to give their views, increased farmgate prices resulting from a change in payment system was envisaged. So while maybe appearing to disagree I appreciate there may be some impact but my comment is in my view most of the inflationary rise in food prices is due to additional costs in the past three years after the raw material leaves the farmgate.

I would imagine you, more than possibly anybody, would have a better idea as to the extra 'risk' in calculating cropping costs when you haven't got a BPS payment as insurance?
How much more do you need to cover the extra risk?
 

Green oak

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Essex
As I’ve written before. I’ve gone 100% into SFI. I had a bad injury late January. Broken bones. I had a panic attack and put the farm into it because I never planted the autumn crops because we are told to wait until late October for grassweed control. I looked at the payments and I looked at my recovery and I had the take the SFI. Owner occupied farm. if I got someone in to do the work I normally do I would have lost money.
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
I would imagine you, more than possibly anybody, would have a better idea as to the extra 'risk' in calculating cropping costs when you haven't got a BPS payment as insurance?
How much more do you need to cover the extra risk?
A good point. And there is some complexity in coming to a figure. As for example rents may reduce. And in the case of certain crops such as rape the uncertainty now experienced is such that BPS is irrelevant in the decision to drop, aided by SFI payments for alternative. And that is the point, I think, JA, for arable it is possible to use the SFI to replace a good proportion of the free cash that was BPS by selecting options that do not detract from yield or area produced but leave spare cash after costs incurred.
 

turbo

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
lincs
In what world can it be argued that BPS keeps food prices down??
Under bps could you 80% of your land down to wild bird mix and it be more profitable than growing crops? That’s how it could be argued that bps keeps food prices down,admittedly the bps was not as good icas because you didn’t need to grow crops to claim it
 

farmerm

Member
Location
Shropshire
Under bps could you 80% of your land down to wild bird mix and it be more profitable than growing crops? That’s how it could be argued that bps keeps food prices down,admittedly the bps was not as good icas because you didn’t need to grow crops to claim it
BPS was a payment for owning land, growing or not growing was irrelevant. It had absolutely no bearing on the price paid by consumers.
 

Jackov Altraids

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
A good point. And there is some complexity in coming to a figure. As for example rents may reduce. And in the case of certain crops such as rape the uncertainty now experienced is such that BPS is irrelevant in the decision to drop, aided by SFI payments for alternative. And that is the point, I think, JA, for arable it is possible to use the SFI to replace a good proportion of the free cash that was BPS by selecting options that do not detract from yield or area produced but leave spare cash after costs incurred.

But isn't that slightly different than deciding whether or not to drill a 100 acre field knowing that should all else fail, there was a £8k BPS payment to cover the costs?
I appreciate SFI spreads some risk but if anything, raises the required return on a crop?
Again, this will surely only lead to prices rising.
 

Hindsight

Member
Location
Lincolnshire
But isn't that slightly different than deciding whether or not to drill a 100 acre field knowing that should all else fail, there was a £8k BPS payment to cover the costs?
I appreciate SFI spreads some risk but if anything, raises the required return on a crop?
Again, this will surely only lead to prices rising.
A different way to collect what I term ‘Ferrari cash’ ’Buy to let cash’ etc. but the end result is same. So SAM1, IPM4 etc, etc do add up. Knock off cost and what is left is ‘BPS’. The amount will differ between farms. So yes Not as simple as £200 hectare, but there all the same. Individuals will react differently in their approach and how much they use to ‘subsidise’ crop production. The fiasco with the 6 options now capped does show farmers react to price signals!?
 

BrianV

Member
Mixed Farmer
Location
Dartmoor
BPS was a payment for owning land, growing or not growing was irrelevant. It had absolutely no bearing on the price paid by consumers.
Where as SFI can only increase the price of food to taxpayers as so much land is taken out of production completely or produce seriously reduced, is that what your average taxpayer struggling to keep afloat wants, I seriously doubt it & I reckon if they knew the truth they would be horrified.
At least with BPS it did nothing to reduce the production of food keeping prices stable.
 

Sonoftheheir

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
West Suffolk
As I’ve written before. I’ve gone 100% into SFI. I had a bad injury late January. Broken bones. I had a panic attack and put the farm into it because I never planted the autumn crops because we are told to wait until late October for grassweed control. I looked at the payments and I looked at my recovery and I had the take the SFI. Owner occupied farm. if I got someone in to do the work I normally do I would have lost money.
Will the reductions effect you?
 

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,802
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top