an increase in cow numbers would probably require an investment in housing which would be covered under AIA
Last edited:
an increase in cow numbers would probably require an investment in housing which would be covered under AIA
an increase in cow numbers would probably require an investment in housing which would be covered under AIA
ok lets sayHow does that dilute the debt?
Cubicles and internal fittings would be but the shed itself is not eligible for any capital allowances.Have you never heard the expression 'do not let the tax tail wag the dog? ' The cows of course for the expansion, and the working capital to feed them, on top of the shed, would be using yet more borrowed money..., yeah really sensible!an increase in cow numbers would probably require an investment in housing which would be covered under AIA
Cubicles and internal fittings would be but the shed itself is not eligible for any capital allowances.Have you never heard the expression 'do not let the tax tail wag the dog? ' The cows of course for the expansion, and the working capital to feed them, on top of the shed, would be using yet more borrowed money..., yeah really sensible!
As a farm business consultant with 30 years experience and a qualified accountant I see so many families who are completely stressed out by debt when if they farmed better rather than chasing cow numbers and more sheds all the time they would have a much easier and probably happier life.I have edited this post
You don't approve then!!
The number in My post were not related to my business.
I wouldn't recommend spending money to reduce tax. but of the conditions were right one could spend money to reduce debt per cow.
As to your other points if I was sensible I wouldn't be farming.
I knew my plan was slightly flawed even before a posted.
There a various ways of dealing with the cost of putting up shed.
introducing cows at the right time of year requires very little working capital and she will pay her way as she goes
yes cows are capital items - employ a decent accountant
As a farm business consultant with 30 years experience and a qualified accountant I see so many families who are completely stressed out by debt when if they farmed better rather than chasing cow numbers and more sheds all the time they would have a much easier and probably happier life.
Had a quote of 1.5% above base on Wednesday and plus +.6% to fix it. That was for buying land with 75%LTV
Question from non dairy person about Danish debt per cow - if say your debt is 10k per cow does that mean lenders are comfortable lending as much as the farmer wants providing that cow is capable of paying back its own debt as it were in milk yields over its lifetime? Obviously I appreciate land values involved too.
Second question - why do they do this? Appreciate costs of expansion must be high but does it mean they must keep milking or is it likely assets will outstrip any debt due? It doesn't sound like much fun to me so what am I missing? - why are they and their banks so happy with this scenario?
I am a danish dairy farmer. I have bought the farm about 2 years ago at marked value and built a new stable since then.
My debt is considerably above 10k per cow. The average around here is about 20k. The pound has weakened considerably since the brexit vote!
This is the conditions if you want to start. Just land is about 18k/ha and 10 years ago it was twice that. You need a ha per cow. I think the average dairy farmer own about 0,5 ha/cow. Most banks look at the production price per liter. My bank wants it under 27ppl.
You are not missing anything. When you buy a dairy farm in denmark, you milk cows! My fixed costs are so high, just stop milking because of low prices, is not a viable option. And no, they are not just lending money because the farmer want or need them! You need a realistic plan that will show a considerable profit within the lifetime of the asset, to just make them consider looking at it.
Happy or not, the capital is already tied up in farming in denmark, the banks just try to find the best farmers to service the debt, so they don't loose any money.
Fair play to you @Serup, would it be fair to assume at levels of 20k a cow your banks wouldn't be pushing hard to get loans repaid in a hurry. I wouldn't earn enough from my cows to be able to pay the interest, never mind even reduce the borrowed amount. I.e 100k interest on each year just to milk 100 cows ....mental.
Serup what do you make at ARLA I'm a costumer of there's
@Serup do the majority of farms own thier land in Denmark? For debt of 20000 a cow to be the norm I'm guessing a lot will own thier farms? In Scotland a very small percentage own thier land,
I would think it would be more like the banks own the farms, i imagine they cant afford too many to fail.