- Location
- Snodland kent
what age is it too late to ring a male lamb
Hill farms do them at 6-8 weeks. Think there’s a hill farm derogation.
Vets otherwise?depends if its dropped both balls
There is no doubt that lambs rung by a competent shepherd suffer less stress if rung at 6 weeks than if rung within a few days of birth.
Which completely contradicts the current regulations.
And the most painful method of all is the burdizzo, because it has very long-term painful effects.
for sure there would be a much bigger wound and relative pain to that ?….before healing on the 6wk oldThere is no doubt that lambs rung by a competent shepherd suffer less stress if rung at 6 weeks than if rung within a few days of birth.
Which completely contradicts the current regulations.
And the most painful method of all is the burdizzo, because it has very long-term painful effects.
There is a big variation between new-born lambs in the structure of the scrotum.
1. Some have a very loose scrotum with a good distance between the teats and the top of the testicles. Such lambs can be rung and show only moderate signs of discomfort.
2. Some have very tight scrotums and there is a risk that either one or more teats are trapped with long-term consequences and/or the top of one or both testicles are trapped. Such lambs suffer far more and prolonged discomfort. Obviously, much is down to the skill of the operator.
If lambs are rung at a later stage, almost all will fall into the former category. That alone shows why it is more humane to ring at a later stage, even though it is against the law.
But where does that show, without doubt, that lambs suffer less being banded at 6 weeks compared to birth?
My own observation is that a higher proportion of lambs rung soon after birth will suffer prolonged severe pain, compared to lambs rung at a later stage.