Devil's advocate
Member
- Location
- Posh side of Barnsley
He is like a Soay tup shagging anything that moves.
But he is totally useless & not fit to sire humans.
But he is totally useless & not fit to sire humans.
I completely agree, but sadly suspect many consenting parties at the time who thought it pretty cool to go home with a celebrity for a bragging to their mates that they slept with none other than Russel Brand will now come out of the woodwork and say it wasn't consent, they were too young, or he wasn't quite as nice as they had expected and was forceful... I'd be highly surprised if any said they didn't leave with him willingly or were afraid before they left... but he will no doubt get done for itQuite agree.
If many of those on this thread had just a tiny iota of a moments thought about how it would feel if their wife/daughter was sexually assaulted then they may just zip it.
I completely agree, but sadly suspect many consenting parties at the time who thought it pretty cool to go home with a celebrity for a bragging to their mates that they slept with none other than Russel Brand will now come out of the woodwork and say it wasn't consent, they were too young, or he wasn't quite as nice as they had expected and was forceful... I'd be highly surprised if any said they didn't leave with him willingly or were afraid before they left... but he will no doubt get done for it
Always has been an arse, he will get what is right no doubt.. a lot of celebrities abuse their status and a lot of impressionable folk fall for it, it won't entirely be his fault though, there will always be 2 sidesLets stick to those currently accusing him.
Those stories do not sound good by any stretch.
If they are true, its not a big stretch to imagine those 5 arent the only ones.
I've come across this many, many times and it generally stops people straight up... if it were their daughter that is making the claim it must be true...Quite agree.
If many of those on this thread had just a tiny iota of a moments thought about how it would feel if their wife/daughter was sexually assaulted then they may just zip it.
Think you're a bit off the mark, people normally stay quiet because they are ashamed and then flood to the surface when it materialises they are not alone....Every single time with celebrities, its never just once. Then the hangers on decide to have a go too.I've come across this many, many times and it generally stops people straight up... if it were their daughter that is making the claim it must be true...
Of course there are false claims made, whether for reasons of money, publicity, jealousy, spite or sheer mischief-making, but although these are more common than most people might think, they are still far from the norm.
If what has been claimed is not true, Brand will have a vast amount of publicity, and awful lot of stress and a huge amount of compensation out of it.
How is testimony as graphic as this allowed to be published ahead of any court case?
There is no court caseHow is testimony as graphic as this allowed to be published ahead of any court case?
"One woman alleges that Brand raped her against a wall in his Los Angeles home. She was treated at a rape crisis centre on the same day, according to medical records. Text messages show that in the hours after leaving his house, she told Brand that she had been scared by him and felt taken advantage of, adding: “When a girl sayNO it means no.” Brand replied saying he was “very sorry”."
"
A second woman alleges that Brand assaulted her when he was 31 and she was 16 and still at school. She said he referred to her as “the child” during an emotionally abusive and controlling relationship that lasted for about three months, and that Brand once “forced his penis down her throat”, making her choke. She says she tried to push him off and said she had to punch him in the stomach to make him stop."
"
As her taxi approached Russell Brand’s home, Alice remembers the driver begging her not to go inside. Recognising the destination, he had started to ask questions. Alice admitted she was 16 and still in school.
She says the driver replied that his daughter was the same age and entreated Alice: “Please, I’m asking you not to go in there, you could be my little girl, and I would want someone to do this for her.” He offered to take her home without charge, but Alice insisted she was fine. “He had just such a sad look in his eyes,” she recalls."
Jesus Christ.
Im no fan of the guy, but paint a target on your back and this is what happens.
I'm in agreement with Lawyers of Light who posted this on Telegram
"I tell you this because when a man has genuinely raped or sexually assaulted multiple women, it is not the papers that investigate it, it's the police. And the investigation doesn't happen 10 years later.
Women that have been raped and want to report it generally do so around the time of the incident (within around 12 months). They generally do not wait years and then report it. If they don't report it at the time, they tend never to report it at all.
Ask yourselves this question. Why are these "allegations the result of a joint investigation by the Sunday Times, the Times and Channel 4 Dispatches", and not as a result of an investigation by the police? These are serious allegations so you would think the police would be involved. But they are not.
Do I think Brand was promiscuous? Yes. Do I think he could have been coercive? Possibly just like thousands of other men are. Do I think he might have liked loads of sex in all sorts of positions and that he may have used his fame to get it? Yes likely, but that is not a crime.
Rape is a serious thing and my comments are not to demean anyone that has suffered any sort of sexual assault, because me having nearly suffered this is enough for me to realise how life changing that is.
But anyone coming forward with historic never before made allegations to a newspaper, instead of to law enforcement, raises serious questions I'm afraid."
Brand is too big now to control with over 6 million you tube subscribers and 11 million twitter followers, and represents a serious threat to both the MSM and others running the narrative of the day. He has a variety of guests on his show and some are really good. He is making people think and that is the problem. The only way to therefore contain him is to smear him.
I'm sorry but I'm not buying this story as it appears. It's off and all my legal training as well as intuition tells me this is a sting operation.
And I say this not being a particular fan of Brand.
I seriously hope he comes out punching on this if, like he says, he has evidence to rebut the allegations, because if he has he will damage the MSM irreparably if he shows everyone that these allegations are not true.
Genuine crimes against women should be reported by women to the police. Not to the newspapers."
I've yet to reach any firm decision about RB - he's sharp, witty, astute and interesting …. he's a showman, nothing more or less and he sells himself to the media and so, to us. Is he real? I'm not sure.
There's one thing that I don't understand about this case and others too; Why was it that his accusers seemingly chose to return for further abusive episodes and after the shock and pain of the initial and supposed attacks? I am not defending him just calling in to question the motives of his accusers.
Do we remember the case of Prince Andrew and the girl; who was shipped over from America? Do we remember how she appeared on camera to be enjoying herself in his company, and how she had an all expenses paid trip over AND £15,000 as payment for her services, and then it appeared that she was somehow a victim ….
And yet that's exactly how Jimmy Saville was exposed...Ask yourselves this question. Why are these "allegations the result of a joint investigation by the Sunday Times, the Times and Channel 4 Dispatches", and not as a result of an investigation by the police? These are serious allegations so you would think the police would be involved. But they are not.
No, and you write on the self-evidently daft assumption that the documentary randomly found women who just happened to focus on the same fellow as their attacker. I have not seen this report, but I think it reasonable to presume that, as with others before, Brand's actions / behaviour have been fairly well know for some time. And, on that basis, there has been ample opportunity for women to discover that they were not alone.Think you're a bit off the mark, people normally stay quiet because they are ashamed and then flood to the surface when it materialises they are not alone....Every single time with celebrities, its never just once. Then the hangers on decide to have a go too.
I get all of that, and took particular pleasure from the fact that he was able to turn the tables on them.Don’t forget Farage very nearly lost the ability to bank due to his political views.
It's a fair point.There's one thing that I don't understand about this case and others too; Why was it that his accusers seemingly chose to return for further abusive episodes and after the shock and pain of the initial and supposed attacks? I am not defending him just calling in to question the motives of his accusers.
Isn't that how grooming works?There's one thing that I don't understand about this case and others too; Why was it that his accusers seemingly chose to return for further abusive episodes and after the shock and pain of the initial and supposed attacks? I am not defending him just calling in to question the motives of his accusers.
Do we remember the case of Prince Andrew and the girl; who was shipped over from America? Do we remember how she appeared on camera to be enjoying herself in his company, and how she had an all expenses paid trip over AND £15,000 as payment for her services, and then it appeared that she was somehow a victim ….