One of my best farms is milking some shorthorns. Lovely cattle.
Great fertility
One of my best farms is milking some shorthorns. Lovely cattle.
Great fertility
About what I get with Genus.Only used Cogent so far. Getting 65% on maiden heifers, which isn’t as high as I was hoping, but not terrible.
Same with Swedish reds and Swedish Holsteins.The shorthorns fertility was exactly the same as the Holsteins in this herd. So depending on which side of the fence you sit on either the cross bred cattle are poor or the Holsteins are fantastic for keeping up with them.
Same with Swedish reds and Swedish Holsteins.
Production as well Fertility and health traits were similar.
It's the fitting the cow to the system or visa versa.
Majority British Friesian but with some Holstein for some traditional friesian type real short arsed cowsAre you pure friesian now or do you use some Holstein?
Is there any research into a trait for semen fertility? Have found a large variance between bulls. @Rossymons
The latter, there must be a lot of data out there on each bulls average conception rates. Maybe less so on newly released genomic bulls.In what regards - a genetic link from the male side to identify the super shooters? Or a way of expressing semen fertility in a rankable index?
The latter, there must be a lot of data out there on each bulls average conception rates. Maybe less so on newly released genomic bulls.
Using up sexed straws I bought approx three years ago. Noticed some of the Milo straws are clear and I always had pink straws when sexed . Should I be worried? @Rossymons ..cogent straws.
When I was milking cows in a previous life I had a blazing row with AHDB Dairy at South West Dairy Event on the subject. The chap I argued with didn't answer my question nor even show any inclination that he understood why I felt it was important. That was a real blot on AHDB Dairys report card from me.
In my new life whilst I still understand the importance of having fertile semen I can see how publishing sire conception rates can be misleading and ranking them even worse.
Just this week on one farm I have bred 3 cows to the same bull. One from our detection system, one vet initiated where we serve the cow regardless and one on a CIDR synch on fixed AI. That vet initiated cow might not have been bulling - I have seen plenty of examples to back this up. Timings could be wrong on CIDR synch and there is no follicle to fertilise. Are either of those the fault of the bulls? Not really, no. Yet he could end up with a 33% success rate. Would you buy that bull? I wouldn't. But the data wouldn't show that the 67% of the time he couldn't have created a pregnancy even if he was the most fertile bull in the world.
Where do you get the data from? The only reliable way would be from NMR and CIS or whoever does full herd recording. Anywhere else is open to all sorts of interpretation.
Are those packages able to differentiate between serving a cow on a synch compared to a standing heat? That will have an influence.
How does a farmer determine a cow in heat? Is she standing? Did she just come in the parlour the wrong side or look at the herdsman funny? Is the inseminator handling the straw correctly and using the right technique?
All of this before we even begin to think about the existing genetics on farm, nutrition, housing, herd health etc.
You take that data from all milk recorded farms up and down the country and average it out you will have a very misleading average figure. The gist is that if it is known to affect fertility it will affect sire conception rate. Some farms are very good at getting cows in calf and some aren't. The most fertile bull in the world will not compensate for the problems on the poorer farms. On one of my best customers farm I can walk past the AI stalls waving the AI gun in the general direction of the cow and she will probably get in calf.
As for ranking these sires should that figure be available - would you trust them? A cheap bull could have a really poor figure simply because he is cheap so crack on regardless. You wouldn't use a £70 sexed straw of a top 10 bull without being absolutely certain she was bulling so naturally that bull would be used less. What about the difference between cows and heifers? We've been doing a big number of synchs on heifers lately. We serve them today and the bull goes in tomorrow. They'll be scanned sometime after Christmas. Who gets the PD+ - the bull in the straw of the bull in the field? There would need some balance in there somewhere to add some reliability behind the figures that you're looking at for them to be trustworthy otherwise what's the point?
So to try and round it all off...yes, Sire Conception Rate might be a useful tool to have but is only a small part of the overall puzzle. I do not buy the conspiracy theories that all studs sell nothing but crap semen. What is the point? We want to sell you a good product because we want you to come back for more. Has there been issues in the past at all studs? I would be amazed if there hasn't been quite frankly. But I bet there have been duff loads of cake sent on farm, I daren't think about how many thousands of tonnes of crap silage have been made over the years. Not a lot said about those.
I wouldn't get too worked up over it as you'll start seeing things that probably aren't there. If there is a problem with fertility and cows not getting incalf then I would start with the cow first and foremost.
Using up sexed straws I bought approx three years ago. Noticed some of the Milo straws are clear and I always had pink straws when sexed . Should I be worried? @Rossymons ..cogent straws.
However we have managed to get something back from a semen supplier because of poor conception. It was obvious on our uniform software. Everything else was the same no change in who was doing the Ai, no whole herd issues we only Ai cows using the gea heat detection. The semen in question was useless compared to all the other bulls we were using at the time so there was really no argument.