Sheep Scanning

[steveR]

Scanned today,

Lanarks

1 empty
14 singles
50 doubles
11 trips

Cheviots

6 empty
25 singles
50 doubles
15 trips

Chev Mules scanned at 230% also

Happy with percentages but always seem to get too many triples for some reason

Keeps wife/children/you happy with cades......

Will the Cheviots feed 3??

 

[copse]

Scanned today,

Lanarks

1 empty
14 singles
50 doubles
11 trips

Cheviots

6 empty
25 singles
50 doubles
15 trips

Chev Mules scanned at 230% also

Happy with percentages but always seem to get too many triples for some reason

You should have twice as many ewes and you won’t get many triplets.

 

[GSJC1960]

Keeps wife/children/you happy with cades......

Will the Cheviots feed 3??

I tried that one last year and got told what to do with them

Have tried it before but just end up with small lambs and mastitis at the back end. Will be a no go this year. Forgot to say I have 2 chevs scanned 4 aswell

 

[GSJC1960]

You should have twice as many ewes and you won’t get many triplets

If I had twice as many I would have to house them in October I’d be better raising ducks atm

 

[JohnAC]

Tups? EC?

Mules and nz suff to meatlinc and EC to EC and meatlinc 1 tip to 60 ewes

 

[beardface]

499 scanned today. Mix of romney, romney x and general x bred ewes that are left over. There was also about 190 odd shearlings in with them.

Barren
14

Single
222

Twin
245

Triplet
18

154%

Happy with that. Will maybe go back to pre tup bolus next year mainly on shearling, just have to be careful as we tend to throw too many triplets if we pre tup bolus.

 

[aangus]

499 scanned today. Mix of romney, romney x and general x bred ewes that are left over. There was also about 190 odd shearlings in with them.

Barren
14

Single
222

Twin
245

Triplet
18

154%

Happy with that. Will maybe go back to pre tup bolus next year mainly on shearling, just have to be careful as we tend to throw too many triplets if we pre tup bolus.

Not a lot empty

 

[beardface]

Not a lot empty

Yeh less than 3% normally anywhere from 2.5 to 6 here so well happy

 

[glensman]

186% everything put to the tup, 192% with the empties removed.

 

[sheepdip]

499 scanned today. Mix of romney, romney x and general x bred ewes that are left over. There was also about 190 odd shearlings in with them.

Barren
14

Single
222

Twin
245

Triplet
18

154%

Happy with that. Will maybe go back to pre tup bolus next year mainly on shearling, just have to be careful as we tend to throw too many triplets if we pre tup bolus.

Would 150-160% be a typical scan for Romney and Romney x ewes?

 

[beardface]

Would 150-160% be a typical scan for Romney and Romney x ewes?

English romneys yeh, nz type anywhere from 150 to 200 I'd say. 170% is my aim every year anymore and it's too many multiples for our ground.

 

[hubbahubba]

Any suggestions how to get less triplets but without dropping the empty percentage? Over the years we've stopped flushing, mineral tubs etc. Most lamb as hoggs. Put a couple of hill cheviots over some ewes which i think could help over time but that lot was 220%. So another year scanned the first lot of 559, 12 empty 145 triplets and 209% overall including 160 gimmers. Ewes are mostly first cross texels out mules. Obviously more dead lambs come out the triplets and price of feeding now its not ideal. Maybe just one of these things but would rather drop it 10%+.

 

[Junior]

Scanned 569 mix Mules and Suffolk X on Sunday
14 Empty
109 Singles
355 Twins
91 Triplets
197% with empties out
Fingers crossed for the ewe lambs next week

 

[AftonShepherd]

I think I've asked this in a previous year, but why do some people take empties out before working out the percentage? Unless they're early lambers who have had more chances and will be scanned again then it gives a false result.

 

[Skintagain]

Scanned 569 mix Mules and Suffolk X on Sunday
14 Empty
109 Singles
355 Twins
91 Triplets
197% with empties out
Fingers crossed for the ewe lambs next week

That’s a good scan

 

[Nithsdale]

I think I've asked this in a previous year, but why do some people take empties out before working out the percentage? Unless they're early lambers who have had more chances and will be scanned again then it gives a false result.

The false result is exactly why they do it


Makes the scan look and sound a lot better for bragging rights

 

[neilo]

The false result is exactly why they do it


Makes the scan look and sound a lot better for bragging rights

I shall be taking the singles and triplets out next time too.

 

[Nithsdale]

I shall be taking the singles and triplets out next time too.

May as well take the twins out while you're at it

I mean a 200% scanning is so 2010 - I've got 1 group thats scanned a solid 400%

 

[DB67]

Old blackies to the blue absolutely terrible, a dud tup bought this year that was given both turns. Half empty.
Mule ewes a nice 176%.
Some old blackies kept pure 161%
Blue ewes more singles than anything which is nice. 150%.

 

[muleman]

It lifts the % considerably with the empties out.
We had 1000 hill swaledales at 213%.....if we took the empties out it would be up about 220% which wouldnt be far off a record.