The plough.

Chae1

Member
Location
Aberdeenshire
Very interesting
Interesting how its a article on how it made the modern world possible.

Many now think its destroying the world.

Perhaps in 50 years it will be a direct drill that saved the world from soil erosion, desertification.

Why did they choose this high draft/intensive way of establishing crops?
They could have simply cut a slit in the soil, put the seeds in and closed it again? Its human nature to find the easiest way.

The small robot company suggest in the future there will be lots of drones/robots going about the fields drilling holes to plant seeds. Surely in times goneby there were so many people going about without a purpose, they could have done the same?

Imagine how great the soil was? Hadn't been poisoned by chemicals, man made fertilisers. No compaction from heavy machines. Why did they start using fertiliser? I mean if the soil biology is right its all available anyway. Tons of it.
 
Last edited:

Stock

Member
It might be the editor that is at fault as they that put in the pictures.................................................. but if one read the article it is progressive so the combi is the technology for farmers and if what I read is true it is the power harrow is what is breaking down the structure of the soil accompanied with to much artificial fertliser.........................
 
Last edited:

Frodo2

Member
That article is ploughing deep and a bit tenuous. Does anyone really believe humans would have been better of if we had remained hunter gatherers?

As for the image it's just a stock photo, slightly off topic, like much of the article.
 
The plough was instrumental in taming wilderness areas so that people could farm them. Id imagine it gave you half a chance to get a crop growing before the weeds turned up.

I would say the washing machine and electricity has been instrumental in allowing societies to develop beyond a very basic level of existence.
 
The last few years we have tried direct drilling on our farm it works 50/50 requires a lot more spraying and still ends up with more weeds... have had some great crops of kale/turnips and also some bad ones
this is into pasture as part of a rotation and heavy wet soils with plenty of stones clay ect

the plow works 99.9 % of the time and requires little if no spraying I’d buy a new plow before a direct drill :rolleyes::rolleyes::)
 

multi power

Member
Location
pembrokeshire
Farmers Weekly have jumped on the band wagon of no till rubbish, claiming better no till soils mean lower HP tractors........yeah....OK.
Won't be long before no tiller tractors are powered by the owners own sense of self satisfaction....

They all seem to be using 100hp plus fent, yet I bet they are still costing more to do the job compared to grey fergies 70 years ago
 

Poorbuthappy

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon
Interesting how its a article on how it made the modern world possible.

Many now think its destroying the world.

Perhaps in 50 years it will be a direct drill that saved the world from soil erosion, desertification.

Why did they choose this high draft/intensive way of establishing crops?
They could have simply cut a slit in the soil, put the seeds in and closed it again? Its human nature to find the easiest way.

The small robot company suggest in the future there will be lots of drones/robots going about the fields drilling holes to plant seeds. Surely in times goneby there were so many people going about without a purpose, they could have done the same?

Imagine how great the soil was? Hadn't been poisoned by chemicals, man made fertilisers. No compaction from heavy machines. Why did they start using fertiliser? I mean if the soil biology is right its all available anyway. Tons of it.
It could be argued learning to create and harness fire has had the biggest affect on civilisation.

But the use of coal and oil, whilst having a profound effect on civilisation, like the perhaps the plough, is maybe a case of maximum response without necessarily understanding the long term consequences.
 
It could be argued learning to create and harness fire has had the biggest affect on civilisation.

But the use of coal and oil, whilst having a profound effect on civilisation, like the perhaps the plough, is maybe a case of maximum response without necessarily understanding the long term consequences.

Even fire would not have been without it's downsides. For a start, it was fire that led people to clear large areas of forestry in the search for fuel and you can bet more than a few times Neanderthals set fire to vast areas of land. Of course, living around a campfire is likely to do little for your respiratory health as well.
 

fudge

Member
Arable Farmer
Location
Lincolnshire.
My reading of the piece is that it was written by someone who laments the development of the human race. Perhaps the adoption of zero till is the first step on the necessary road back to being hunter gatherers?
 

Will you help clear snow?

  • yes

    Votes: 99 33.2%
  • no

    Votes: 199 66.8%

The London Palladium event “BPR Seminar”

  • 47,019
  • 692
This is our next step following the London rally 🚜

BPR is not just a farming issue, it affects ALL business, it removes incentive to invest for growth

Join us @LondonPalladium on the 16th for beginning of UK business fight back👍

Back
Top