JohnGalway
Member
- Location
- Connemara, Ireland
March is apparently not a good month for Russian/Soviet leaders.
Jan/Feb aren't looking great either
March is apparently not a good month for Russian/Soviet leaders.
You use the wrong terminology, Putin hasn't been pushed, he has been told pretty clearly that he shouldn't be such an ars*hole. He has pushed, against his own people, against others; now he's pushed too far.
He didn't just allow, but actively encouraged and ensured an utterly corrupt society, entirely dominated by him. An irony, in that it was an absolute necessity for his maintaining power, but it was the perfect recipe for the guaranteed failure of his military - there wasn't the cash and nobody has the courage to speak truth to power.
Agree there's been lots of Western hypocrisy and cowardice, let's hope to now see an end to it.
No need for respect and none asked for - as an aside I find the 'shrining' that we see of 'veterans' in the US rather puzzling; a bit of gratitude, maybe, but not mollycoddling, certainly no need for kid gloves. Having served in the military doesn't make one morally superior, it just offers a different perspective, from experience.
Well I'm not going to overplay the hypocrisy and cowardice, but it was there... I think NATO has less to look shamefaced about than Western leaders; annoyingly for me and irritatingly for you, that applies to the UK and a lot - maybe all - of the EU states, and Switzerland, and others. Putin and his cronies have been tolerated, humoured, welcomed, given nationality! etc. etc. And we bought his oil and his gas and his iron.I would disagree with the Western hypocrisy and cowardice bit, as the more I think about it, the more I think NATO has it about right if somewhat unfortunately for the Ukrainians. The Russian state was/is in a hole economically and getting worse, due to sanctions, corruption, covid etc. Putin's solution seems to have been the standard dictators response blame a neighbouring country and in this case the West as well, in an effort to explain and galvanise the Russian population into accepting their continued hardship. To put NATO forces in direct confrontation with Russia, would just confirm to the Russian population that there leader was entirely correct in his actions. As it is, he is reduced to lies and censorship on a massive scale to hide the truth which can only work for so long.
I wouldn't disagree with that at all. The west has been complicit for a number of decades in encouraging Russians and Russia into economic cooperation and mutual dependency as a way of mitigating the risk of future conflict. This has now blown up spectacularly in our faces. Back to the drawing board I guess.Well I'm not going to overplay the hypocrisy and cowardice, but it was there... I think NATO has less to look shamefaced about than Western leaders; annoyingly for me and irritatingly for you, that applies to the UK and a lot - maybe all - of the EU states, and Switzerland, and others. Putin and his cronies have been tolerated, humoured, welcomed, given nationality! etc. etc. And we bought his oil and his gas and his iron.
I think NATO could certainly have armed Ukraine, more, better and earlier, both covertly and overtly. I certainly would not have NATO give Putin any propaganda victory, but there needs to be a visable, demonstrable and constant presence - in fact there always needed to be, it's just become undeniable now.
It was, and is. They can't do anything, they take up resources, they block further advance and they make easy targets and news stories.An excellent thread on logistics and THAT 40 mile convoy
It wouldn't get a penny from me; the whole point of Ukraine's struggle is to maintain democracy and the rule of law, something like this utterly undermines that and gives a propaganda prize to Putin.How much do you think a just giving page would raise for a bounty to take out putin.
Would just need some greedy nutters to action it .
Presumably that was how Merkel saw things.I wouldn't disagree with that at all. The west has been complicit for a number of decades in encouraging Russians and Russia into economic cooperation and mutual dependency as a way of mitigating the risk of future conflict. This has now blown up spectacularly in our faces. Back to the drawing board I guess.
A Russian oligarch has already offered a million dollars to kill Putin, but it isn't that simple. You only have to look at the attempts on Hitler to realise how difficult and complex an operation it would need to be. But there is always a chance with some luck that the people around him decide he has become a liability and remove him one way or another.How much do you think a just giving page would raise for a bounty to take out putin.
Would just need some greedy nutters to action it .
It was, and is. They can't do anything, they take up resources, they block further advance and they make easy targets and news stories.
Parts - presumably from the front - have moved, but there is still a very large column on the original road. A problem the Russians have is that they've allowed the Ukrainians weeks to prepare a 'reception' for them, and to impede their progress on all the routes into and around Kiev.I may be corrected but I believe it has since dispersed
It was to keep her green lobby happy, anything else is spin,they had no need to buy gas they had plenty of coal and nuclear to generate electric withPresumably that was how Merkel saw things.