Urea vs protectdd urea

Jdunn55

Member
What's the difference other than £60/t?

Does the protected stuff milk the cows for me or transport the grass to the silage pit? Or is it another magic potion created by someone clever?

What time of the year do you need to switch to ammonium nitrate? End of may/early June?
 

Jackov Altraids

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Devon


N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) (Figure 1) is an active ingredient in nitrogen stabilizer (urease inhibitor), which temporarily inhibits the action of the urease enzyme to improve the efficiency of urea-containing fertilizers. Given the potential for NBPT residues to be present in milk and tissues of dairy cattle, due diligence is needed to demonstrate the safety of NBPT in urea-based fertilizers used on forages and crops intended for consumption by Holstein dairy cows. This study used controlled dosing of NBPT in capsule form to dairy cattle for 28 d, followed by a 14-d depuration phase to assess the potential for residues to exist in milk and tissues of dairy cattle at exaggerated use levels. Fourteen lactating cows were selected for the dosing and depuration phases of the study, based on health, body weight (BW), and milk production. There were four treatment groups: 0 mg NBPT/kg BW (Control) (n = 2 cows), 1 mg NBPT/kg BW (1×) (n = 3 cows), 3 mg NBPT/kg BW (3×) (n = 3 cows), and 10 mg NBPT/kg/BW (10×) (n = 6 cows); levels were based on maximum tolerable amount of urea that a cow can ingest on a daily basis (1×) and the maximum concentration of NBPT commercially used when treating urea (0.1 wt% NBPT in urea). At the end of the 28-d dosing phase, cows were randomly selected for the 14-d depuration phase of the study (one control and three 10× cows). The results showed no NBPT residue is detectable at all dose levels, except that a residue level was above the lower limit of quantitation in a single milk and subcutaneous fat sample in the highest (10×) treatment group, which represents the level of NBPT that would be theoretically present in 10× the lethal dosing of daily consumable urea to a cow. Overall, the study demonstrated that it is unlikely for NBPT residues to be present in cattle milk or edible tissues or to cause negative effects on animal health under good agricultural practice.
 

Farmer Keith

Member
Location
North Cumbria
Talking to my rep about this the other day, any thoughts on what happens if you spread protected and there’s only a small amount of rain. Is it the case that it’ll wash the protection off and leave the exposed urea to float away into the atmosphere? If that’s the case it still needs an 1” of rain on it and you may as well use in treated.
 


N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) (Figure 1) is an active ingredient in nitrogen stabilizer (urease inhibitor), which temporarily inhibits the action of the urease enzyme to improve the efficiency of urea-containing fertilizers. Given the potential for NBPT residues to be present in milk and tissues of dairy cattle, due diligence is needed to demonstrate the safety of NBPT in urea-based fertilizers used on forages and crops intended for consumption by Holstein dairy cows. This study used controlled dosing of NBPT in capsule form to dairy cattle for 28 d, followed by a 14-d depuration phase to assess the potential for residues to exist in milk and tissues of dairy cattle at exaggerated use levels. Fourteen lactating cows were selected for the dosing and depuration phases of the study, based on health, body weight (BW), and milk production. There were four treatment groups: 0 mg NBPT/kg BW (Control) (n = 2 cows), 1 mg NBPT/kg BW (1×) (n = 3 cows), 3 mg NBPT/kg BW (3×) (n = 3 cows), and 10 mg NBPT/kg/BW (10×) (n = 6 cows); levels were based on maximum tolerable amount of urea that a cow can ingest on a daily basis (1×) and the maximum concentration of NBPT commercially used when treating urea (0.1 wt% NBPT in urea). At the end of the 28-d dosing phase, cows were randomly selected for the 14-d depuration phase of the study (one control and three 10× cows). The results showed no NBPT residue is detectable at all dose levels, except that a residue level was above the lower limit of quantitation in a single milk and subcutaneous fat sample in the highest (10×) treatment group, which represents the level of NBPT that would be theoretically present in 10× the lethal dosing of daily consumable urea to a cow. Overall, the study demonstrated that it is unlikely for NBPT residues to be present in cattle milk or edible tissues or to cause negative effects on animal health under good agricultural practice.
What does that mean in english?
They fed it to cows??
 

Two Tone

Member
Mixed Farmer
I’ve been using unprotected Urea exclusively since the early 80’s and this nonsense about it needing rain soon after spreading or it’ll volatilise is a total load of Bollox!
It will only do so on bare soil over 27 degrees C. When is that going to happen? Even using it for late protein applications on milling wheat in June, it still works as it never gets that hot at the soil surface then.
It won’t disappear if it doesn’t rain and it will happily stay unused until the following year if it didn’t get used the year you applied it. It certainly does not need anything like an inch of rain to activate it.

Most of the rest of the world uses unprotected Urea, including hot countries like Australia and India.
It is only because we never made Urea in the UK that we stuck with AN.
The AN manufacturers have conned everybody here into making us believe the volatilisation nonsense.
Those losses if any, are lower than the leaching of AN into watercourses.
When has anybody ever smelled ammonia volatilising from unprotected Urea treated fields?

IMO, if you use AN, you are just wasting money, unless you need a very quick response.
Just put Urea on a fortnight earlier. No need for 3 dressings as 2 will do the same job.
I’ve used it in some very warm, dry years without any problems whatsoever!

In the early years, it only problem was finding a spreader that would accurately spread the pilled Urea, unless you used a pneumatic spreader.
Since granular became available, that problem was solved and forgotten.

Normally, I’d want to put my final, main dressing on in early April and definitely by the 7th, because it is slower to work than AN. But would happily put unprotected on by the end of March, if I have to.
The first dressing can go on, on a frost anytime in February. It’ll just sit there until it warms up enough to be usable.
 
Last edited:

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,799
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top