- Location
- Co antrim
We're both tractors dynoed before the run?Seen this video, now the case could be mapped out more but the difference here is vast so got me thinking is the agco vario far more power hungry than the nh cvt?
Had demo of case 175 cvx jd6155r and the JD just had the edge with the same load. Both will outpull the fastrac with an agco gearbox plenty folk will say it's software but ive tried a fendt and found it fairly dead.Seen this video, now the case could be mapped out more but the difference here is vast so got me thinking is the agco vario far more power hungry than the nh cvt?
Why not tho ? We compare brands every time we demo for a new replacement and they're all around the same hp.Wouldn’t consider it a fair comparison between brands, the torque settings could be all over the place.
Why not tho ? We compare brands every time we demo for a new replacement and they're all around the same hp.
Yeah I get that but them tests always look fair enough to me same load on different brands over the same run what else can you do ? Just like an on farm demoBecause software in both the engines and gearbox varies within brand let alone between brand.
I’ve no problem one being compared to another if it’s apples for apples, but the differences are way way more than just raw power.
Its a case 165 cvx and a mf 7718, cant just see for sure but looks like a dynavt, both models pretty similar in power,both 6 pot, both the largest of the small wheelbase in thier series. Case is probably chipped out further but its that bad lookin for the mf the case could nearly of done it twice in the time it took the mfYeah I get that but them tests always look fair enough to me same load on different brands over the same run what else can you do ? Just like an on farm demo
I just watched it. Either the mf or mf driver is very slow at getting away or the case operator is getting the jump on him off the line and I've no idea of the models or horsepower but if they are equivalent under the bonnet the case looks way better to me it wasn't as far in front on the second run but certainly looks more lively
It's pretty bad if it is opened up as that's not fair at all .Its a case 165 cvx and a mf 7718, cant just see for sure but looks like a dynavt, both models pretty similar in power,both 6 pot, both the largest of the small wheelbase in thier series. Case is probably chipped out further but its that bad lookin for the mf the case could nearly of done it twice in the time it took the mf
Im just guessing, but even it had an extra 20hp it shouldnt make that much differenceIt's pretty bad if it is opened up as that's not fair at all .
We've a mapped tractor on farm and it's very good compared to a standard one so if they are doing comparison then they should be standard
Surely if it was in high range the driver woukd of realised and went to low range on second run, if he didnt realise he needs removed from driving an agco varioSomething not right there, i bet the mf is in high range & id say it needed to be in lower one
That would kill it straight away,
Hence pointless unless they were both dynoed the same just before hitching to the trailerIts a case 165 cvx and a mf 7718, cant just see for sure but looks like a dynavt, both models pretty similar in power,both 6 pot, both the largest of the small wheelbase in thier series. Case is probably chipped out further but its that bad lookin for the mf the case could nearly of done it twice in the time it took the mf
Yeah I get that but them tests always look fair enough to me same load on different brands over the same run what else can you do ? Just like an on farm demo
I just watched it. Either the mf or mf driver is very slow at getting away or the case operator is getting the jump on him off the line and I've no idea of the models or horsepower but if they are equivalent under the bonnet the case looks way better to me it wasn't as far in front on the second run but certainly looks more lively