Hilly
Member
- Location
- Scottish Borders.
Because it’s all they have ?Then put a big tedder on it! Dad's neighbour runs 2 15 metre tedders on JD6630's covering about 40 acres and hour. Why would anyone use a 200+hp tractor for tedding?
Because it’s all they have ?Then put a big tedder on it! Dad's neighbour runs 2 15 metre tedders on JD6630's covering about 40 acres and hour. Why would anyone use a 200+hp tractor for tedding?
I’ve been Turing hay this week with a 3185 fastrac cos it has air con and is comfortable it don’t use a lot of fuelThen put a big tedder on it! Dad's neighbour runs 2 15 metre tedders on JD6630's covering about 40 acres and hour. Why would anyone use a 200+hp tractor for tedding?
Give me a cabless DB 780 over any modern tractor on a tedder on days like today, oh and my youth as wellI’ve been Turing hay this week with a 3185 fastrac cos it has air con and is comfortable it don’t use a lot of fuel
Kills me I get hay fever , it’s air con or imGive me a cabless DB 780 over any modern tractor on a tedder on days like today, oh and my youth as well
Sadly no easy answer, If you try and work out the answer, probably the 4 tonne crop of wheat will produce the most calories for least input, but not trying to grow it on a Welsh mountainI think the really interesting question is how many calories of fuel is used to produce on calorie of food? This answer is the ultimate arbiter of food production system; organic, bio dynamic, GM, monocrop arable, mixed, regenerative, ploughing, direct drilling, min til? If we reduce fuel use it is better for the climate. Is it better to eat a lamb off the hills with virtually no fuel used or wheat at 10 t/ha?
My rough calc is that we use a similar amount of diesel making silage with a SPF & big supporting kit compared with 40 years ago,Zetor crystal, trailed Jaguer Ford 3000 & Int 275 with 3 ton trailers.Hmmm maybe the 135 uses more fuel per acre than big tractor with big Tedder ?
I’ve been Turing hay this week with a 3185 fastrac cos it has air con and is comfortable it don’t use a lot of fuel
As a youngster if the choice was a 4000 or something bigger with Qcab and radio i’d have been in the Qcab tractor even if it looked daft now it’s the right tractor for the job every time (i still have a 4000 and a 4600 and a 4610). As for my son he’s having fun because we won’t be getting a Fendt ever especially not one as stupidly big. Yesterday he was learning how to run a Lexion 8900 and we most certainly won’t be getting one of those. I believe crop yields are static in UK because of the damage to soil done by bigger and bigger equipment not just through sheer weight but by the ability to drag tackle through the soil at times it shouldn’t be touched. Perhaps instead of promoting direct drilling to save soils we should be looking at weight limits of equipment allowed in fields.Boy thats a huge extreme difference you quote
depends on context imo.
i would rather drive a 4000 ...
( not that it was ever my favourite tractor there is other lightweight 'classics, that would suit me better and maybe a few yrs newer with a quieter cab and ps. )
...that i owned and paid for and on my own farm business than work for someone else on a fancy fendt.
the thing is , if there is so many looking for a way into farming ? then surely they would agree with that .
bottom line is if you genuinely want to/ like,/ love to to farm keep stock ,grow things etc in there own right fancy glossy machines to ride around on arent quite the thing.
i took the op to mean theres far too much emphasis on getting bigger/ heavier /fancier kit (imo thats the Elephant in the room) where does that end .
Exactly .My rough calc is that we use a similar amount of diesel making silage with a SPF & big supporting kit compared with 40 years ago,Zetor crystal, trailed Jaguer Ford 3000 & Int 275 with 3 ton trailers.
Only difference, a short day compared with 2.5 days
well I was wondering if it might be no till with animals on the farm, and lower yeilds, but lower inputs, probably not organic with ploughing, but I would be inclined to say you can't beat Welsh Lamb!Sadly no easy answer, If you try and work out the answer, probably the 4 tonne crop of wheat will produce the most calories for least input, but not trying to grow it on a Welsh mountain
I plod about at 1500 revs at 16k"Gear up, Throttle down"
Even in 1993, my Deutz has a "Econ PTO" point marked on the rev counter at 1600 rpm
I ignore it - Open the front window & wallow in the sound of an air cooled 6 cylinder on full chat
Exactly , even talking about it here is a joke let alone doing anything unless they doUnless you get China on board you may as well pee in the ocean, and there is little chance of that's ,
I actually told him that it was illegal plus i’m sure a 54 ft header and trailer plus tractor might be breaking some rules.The dealer was negligent for not warning him to keep to the speed limit!
4 ton is pub yield as well , the truth will be more like 2 average .Sadly no easy answer, If you try and work out the answer, probably the 4 tonne crop of wheat will produce the most calories for least input, but not trying to grow it on a Welsh mountain
It must be next to nothing because the digesters are hauling it miles and that's green energy