Needs to charge more thenBecause the total cfa returns may be below his true overheads despite the number 2 account showing a profit.
Needs to charge more thenBecause the total cfa returns may be below his true overheads despite the number 2 account showing a profit.
It’s irrelevant. There is only a set amount in the pie to be shared. I’m not talking about job by job contracting.Needs to charge more then
There's obviously something left in the pie for a profit to be shown. DD would lower the cost of stubble to stubble borne by the contractor, but not necessarily affect the charge to the CFA?It’s irrelevant. There is only a set amount in the pie to be shared. I’m not talking about job by job contracting.
Of course it’s pointless. You only have to look at the cfa surveys done by the likes of strutts or Bidwells then compare it to often published benchmarking figures to realise that that.There's obviously something left in the pie for a profit to be shown. DD would lower the cost of stubble to stubble borne by the contractor, but not necessarily affect the charge to the CFA?
Bloody pointless doing it for nowt
Less machinery, less staff is the answer. And fuel use slashed by at least half.What do all the staff do in winter under DD? Fair doos with family labour, but if your drilling window is smaller, just what do you do with the staff for four months of the year.
On 5000 acres one self employed guy on digger all winter doing ditches, the other one who is employed is outloading grain and doing ‘estate work’ so hedge cutting etc. that’s all we have and some harvest help.What do all the staff do in winter under DD? Fair doos with family labour, but if your drilling window is smaller, just what do you do with the staff for four months of the year.
You're as shaved to the bone as that and can't see the benefit in direct drilling unless you can sell the culltivation kit? Blimey.On 5000 acres one self employed guy on digger all winter doing ditches, the other one who is employed is outloading grain and doing ‘estate work’ so hedge cutting etc. that’s all we have and some harvest help.
Not really to the bone. We don’t need loads of ploughs and cultivation kit. We have a few old bits we occasionally need and hire if we need something special. The mole plough is our main tool. I’d rather not have 150k’s worth of kit sat in the yard not doing anything.You're as shaved to the bone as that and can't see the benefit in direct drilling unless you can sell the culltivation kit? Blimey.
What's your system?Not really to the bone. We don’t need loads of ploughs and cultivation kit. We have a few old bits we occasionally need and hire if we need something special. The mole plough is our main tool. I’d rather not have 150k’s worth of kit sat in the yard not doing anything.
What do you pull the mole plough with?Not really to the bone. We don’t need loads of ploughs and cultivation kit. We have a few old bits we occasionally need and hire if we need something special. The mole plough is our main tool. I’d rather not have 150k’s worth of kit sat in the yard not doing anything.
Direct disc or tine drill. Heavy land. Mole draining.What's your system?
A twin leg maidwell with a jd 8rx which has replaced a quad trackWhat do you pull the mole plough with?
It’s pointless being like this. You either commit or you don’t. All you do is make your overheads go up by having every bit of kit available for every system. The only saving you get is a bit of fuel when you do decide to DD a crop.
Like I said what you describe is the difference between seeing it as a completely different agronomic system vs saving some money on establishment sometimes.I disagree. If the kit is bought and paid for you can adapt your plans according to the season. If it turns wet and to bilge then you can plough and combi as a last resort. A looked after and years old plough and combi drill need not be thousands sat stood up.
Not all direct drillers are total bio-evangelists. Some of them I know of were doing it because it was cheap and could be done in less than half the time, yet their crops remained basically the same.
I like ploughing and tractors as much as the next man but I don't like spending money for the sake of it.
Like I said what you describe is the difference between seeing it as a completely different agronomic system vs saving some money on establishment sometimes.
you can’t play and combi on this soil anyway.
If it goes wet you need loads of cover to drill into, we did that last year and got excellent yields and was one of the few to get drilled up without making a huge mess.
FairI know people who have successfully done both down here where plough and combi would be the default option for most.
In a cooperative season, the direct drilling method worked fine.
You put it better than me. Completely agree.For me, no till is a system, you ether buy into it or not, its up to you, but I don’t see the point of farting around running some half arsed hybrid system dipping in and out, all you end up with is all the costs and not many of the rewards.
Heavy land here sees two wheats, cc, spring beans, two wheats, cc, spring oats.For me, no till is a system, you ether buy into it or not, its up to you, but I don’t see the point of farting around running some half arsed hybrid system dipping in and out, all you end up with is all the costs and not many of the rewards.