SimpersTradeCounter
Member
- Location
- Ely, Cambridgeshire.
That's if anyone's interested ???
Of course we are.That's if anyone's interested ???
It was more about testing the effects when trying to achieve 200 l/ha or there abouts' at differing speeds and pressure. The findings were totally counter intuitive as far as we had first thought.Out of interest, why did you decide to change the pressure & forward speed between the tests? Would be good to see the first test performed at 3 bar & 12kmh also......wouldn't expect wildly differing results, but may show up some vortex effect from the finer droplets & faster forward speed.....?
Sorry. I'm being a bit slow this morning. You're saying that the best configuration is the twin cap with 10 degrees forward & 50 degrees backwards?
Why 200 litres/ha? I'd say the most common rate is 100 litres/ha at 12 kph. The logic would dictate that the rearward facing nozzle would be even more important at the higher speed.
Agrovista reckoned that down/backwards with a twin cap was the best configuration for application pre & early post emergence. Syngenta say it's alternating forwards/backwards, though they haven't done much with twin caps & don't have angled nozzles small enough (015) for 100 l/ha work in twin caps.This may have something to do with their previous history of nozzle blockages in bigger 03 angled Hawk nozzles.
Is the problem with controlling bg in cloddy seedbeds all about coverage? Clods imply a more "open" seedbed which IME allows bg to emerge from deeper than 2 inches. My prejudice is that these weeds are the most difficult to control.