solo
Member
- Location
- worcestershire
I also think you are on the right lines My slant on it was:
1. Get rid of beans due to no pesticides. Less beans =higher price.
2. Due to hedges being an enormous mess less farmers will use it.
3. Buffer strips will be used more.
4. More temporary grass and fallow as efa means less production.
The positive bit they may have overlooked is prices may rise due to less production.
Conclusion: Higher prices mean subs can be cut more easily in that consultation which they don't want land managers having a great vote in.
PS. Don't fancy Russia. At least here i can see when daylight robbery is taking place and usually able to go elsewhere. Not so sure it's a choice over there.
1. Get rid of beans due to no pesticides. Less beans =higher price.
2. Due to hedges being an enormous mess less farmers will use it.
3. Buffer strips will be used more.
4. More temporary grass and fallow as efa means less production.
The positive bit they may have overlooked is prices may rise due to less production.
Conclusion: Higher prices mean subs can be cut more easily in that consultation which they don't want land managers having a great vote in.
PS. Don't fancy Russia. At least here i can see when daylight robbery is taking place and usually able to go elsewhere. Not so sure it's a choice over there.