River Lugg, Herefordshire

Status
Not open for further replies.
The EA needs to be scaled back and its responsibility for river maintenance removed and placed with the County Councils. Then the victims of flooding can take their revenge at the ballot box. If County Cllrs were seeing their electorates homes flooding they would force their staff to dredge for fear of losing out at the next election.

Don't do that ! Councils here can't even keep the gullies clear on the roads, yet they repair the sides of the road damaged by running water caused by blocked gullies !
 
I read that Italy was once full of deep soil, however how the Romans farmed caused it to be lost, hence why the Roman Empire kept expanding to gain new farmland to grow their crops. I believe farming started in Mesopetania (present day Irac), but I think the way the land was farmed, caused it to lose it's topsoil and end up as desert. Jared Diamond talks about civilisations failing through loss of topsoil.
View attachment 935934
They can date the silts in the river deltas around the Med. They tie up with the ploughing of hillsides to feed the expanding Roman empire.
 

kiwi pom

Member
Location
canterbury NZ
When the EU waste directive came in the UK interpretation was that river silt became waste once the bucket had deposited it. It also has to be chemically analysed before work starts and if any contaminants exceed levels set in law it becomes hazardous waste.

Overnight this raised the cost of desilting projects around 5 fold in most places. Around here we stopped all rural desilting immediately and even clearing the critical channels in London became too expensive in many cases (all classified as hazardous thus having to be carted 70 miles to a licensed tip at Peterborough so only 1 load per lorry per day)

1 step forward, 3 steps back.

Exactly. A lot of this thread seems to be about how farmers could fix the problem easily but they're all ignoring the rules that have been made.
An earthworks contractor that didn't have to abide by the rules could fix it easily too. Imagine if they could go on anyone's land whenever they wanted with no permission to fix things. The land agents would have a heart attack.

The problem is people trying to do the work do have to stick to the rules, so they're fighting with their hands behind their back.
 

Henarar

Member
Livestock Farmer
Location
Somerset
Exactly. A lot of this thread seems to be about how farmers could fix the problem easily but they're all ignoring the rules that have been made.
An earthworks contractor that didn't have to abide by the rules could fix it easily too. Imagine if they could go on anyone's land whenever they wanted with no permission to fix things. The land agents would have a heart attack.

The problem is people trying to do the work do have to stick to the rules, so they're fighting with their hands behind their back.
that's the point the farmers don't need permission from themselves
 
It was never this bad in Shrewsbury when I was at school there in the 70s
The 70’s is a fair while ago now, a lot has changed.
It’s often mentioned on here about when more work was carried out maintaining the rivers, dredging etc. I don’t know when that stopped but that lack of maintenance won’t have helped.
Plus there is the amount of building work that has taken place in the years since channeling rain water rapidly into watercourses, it must add up to 1000’s of acres. The amount of land lost to bypasses alone must lead to a lot of extra water finding its way into the river, apart from Shrewsbury bypass there’s Nescliffe, Oswestry, Four Crosses, Welshpool, Newtown, and Llanidloes that I can think of in that time, that a fair chunk of farmland tarmaced over, no doubt dwarfed by the number of houses and industrial units with their associated roadways that have been built in that time, it all sends rainwater downstream faster than from the farmland it’s replaced.
 
The 70’s is a fair while ago now, a lot has changed.
It’s often mentioned on here about when more work was carried out maintaining the rivers, dredging etc. I don’t know when that stopped but that lack of maintenance won’t have helped.
Plus there is the amount of building work that has taken place in the years since channeling rain water rapidly into watercourses, it must add up to 1000’s of acres. The amount of land lost to bypasses alone must lead to a lot of extra water finding its way into the river, apart from Shrewsbury bypass there’s Nescliffe, Oswestry, Four Crosses, Welshpool, Newtown, and Llanidloes that I can think of in that time, that a fair chunk of farmland tarmaced over, no doubt dwarfed by the number of houses and industrial units with their associated roadways that have been built in that time, it all sends rainwater downstream faster than from the farmland it’s replaced.

double whammy. Less river works and more building.

from what I have worked out 1m3 of buffer storage is needed per 100m2 of new hard standing To pacify planners!

thats a huge amount of attention which may have gone in with good intention bit as it silts up the retention will fall making the problem worse
 

holwellcourtfarm

Member
Livestock Farmer
double whammy. Less river works and more building.

from what I have worked out 1m3 of buffer storage is needed per 100m2 of new hard standing To pacify planners!

thats a huge amount of attention which may have gone in with good intention bit as it silts up the retention will fall making the problem worse
20 years ago the EA only required SUDS to cater for a 1 in 20 year event. Now it's 1 in 100 plus climate change.

The trouble is:
1. The size is determined by theoretical models paid for by the developer who puts pressure on the consultant to keep it small.

2. The planning system is ineffective at ensuring the measures are maintained at design impact.

3. It's not uncommon for elements of the SUDS scheme to be "modified" later, in ways that reduce their effectiveness, to cut maintenance costs. It's been done near here by Hertfordshire Highways on a major bypass scheme!
 

Exfarmer

Member
Location
Bury St Edmunds
20 years ago the EA only required SUDS to cater for a 1 in 20 year event. Now it's 1 in 100 plus climate change.

The trouble is:
1. The size is determined by theoretical models paid for by the developer who puts pressure on the consultant to keep it small.

2. The planning system is ineffective at ensuring the measures are maintained at design impact.

3. It's not uncommon for elements of the SUDS scheme to be "modified" later, in ways that reduce their effectiveness, to cut maintenance costs. It's been done near here by Hertfordshire Highways on a major bypass scheme!
or as happened in Milton Keynes where the large buffer storage became permanently flooded to cater for public enjoyment , fishing, water sports etc. totally negating the construction of the balancing lakes
 

chickens and wheat

Member
Mixed Farmer
A local building development ran into serious problems with run off, and allegedly had to spend 1000's hiring in water cleaning systems to sort all the dirty water, They now seem to have the attenuation ponds etc finished and working.
Something has gone wrong however there is now a deep flood on the main road in a place that was never a problem before
 

Bongodog

Member
Or indeed from my experience, any maintenance of streetlighting or any other infrastructure...
Streetlighting wouldn't usually be a responsibility of a management company set up for a housing development. As long as the roads are adopted the road surface and lighting fall under the remit of the County Council.
There was a time when parish councils routinely adopted public open spaces, they found however that the costs were huge especially when the developers started putting water storage reservoirs under kids playgrounds !!!
 

steveR

Member
Mixed Farmer
Streetlighting wouldn't usually be a responsibility of a management company set up for a housing development. As long as the roads are adopted the road surface and lighting fall under the remit of the County Council.
There was a time when parish councils routinely adopted public open spaces, they found however that the costs were huge especially when the developers started putting water storage reservoirs under kids playgrounds !!!

Around here, there were a lot of developers building on land aquired from the Development Corporation that did not have proper formal arrangements with the local authorities, this is still happening. IKWYM about the issues with taking on a "POS", as Inhad to work hard to dissuade my successor from taking on land that would have incorpororated buffer storage! :eek:

Two local sites were going to go for private lighting contractors, and was involved with a conversation to allow the PC take over the Lighting as we are, unusually, a lighting authority.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

SFI - What % were you taking out of production?

  • 0 %

    Votes: 105 40.5%
  • Up to 25%

    Votes: 94 36.3%
  • 25-50%

    Votes: 39 15.1%
  • 50-75%

    Votes: 5 1.9%
  • 75-100%

    Votes: 3 1.2%
  • 100% I’ve had enough of farming!

    Votes: 13 5.0%

May Event: The most profitable farm diversification strategy 2024 - Mobile Data Centres

  • 1,738
  • 32
With just a internet connection and a plug socket you too can join over 70 farms currently earning up to £1.27 ppkw ~ 201% ROI

Register Here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-mo...2024-mobile-data-centres-tickets-871045770347

Tuesday, May 21 · 10am - 2pm GMT+1

Location: Village Hotel Bury, Rochdale Road, Bury, BL9 7BQ

The Farming Forum has teamed up with the award winning hardware manufacturer Easy Compute to bring you an educational talk about how AI and blockchain technology is helping farmers to diversify their land.

Over the past 7 years, Easy Compute have been working with farmers, agricultural businesses, and renewable energy farms all across the UK to help turn leftover space into mini data centres. With...
Top