ollie989898
Member
I have watched it to the end and posted a few notes as I went. Very interesting but not as damning as the chap makes out. He could easily have made the same observations with 50% less words, but that's a minor issue.
The point being of course that some people look at all the evidence from all available sources in a dispassionate way. We do not selectively watch and select from only one point of view and fully recognise that things aren't all either black or white and that most things are shades of grey. Something you really should learn at a younger age.
The bloke is clearly a PhD of some import. If you have ever met anyone remotely connected to molecular biology or any of it's associated fields, you would realise- they are all like this without exception.
EDIT: I'm not interested in grey thanks- I've consistently looked for black or white and evidence that the stuff works before you advocate dosing people with the stuff in big numbers. To do anything less is clearly unethical (and a waste of everyone's time and money, more to the point).
Last edited: