- Location
- South Molton
Because of governments cheap food policySo why is unassured grain allowed into the country?
Because of governments cheap food policySo why is unassured grain allowed into the country?
Then why isn't the nfu standing up for its members and either demanding that imports are assured or saying that home produced grain doesn't need assurance as it is already superior to most imported grain due to our existing legal regulations re pesticides?Because of governments cheap food policy
Then why isn't the nfu standing up for its members and either demanding that imports are assured or saying that home produced grain doesn't need assurance as it is already superior to most imported grain due to our existing legal regulations re pesticides?
Because of governments cheap food policy
They can yes,
As far as I have been "told" no horse meat was found in a RT product.
Was mostly value range
Organic would be as well with strict protocols and standards. To prevent contamination.But the products with horse meat were almost certainly processed/ produced in the same premises that make RT labelled products.
That kind of lets the whole assurance scheme down somewhat.
But to address that would cost the processors and supermarkets rather than us.
But they did say at the time none was found in a RT product.
They also put full page adverts in all the main newspapers.
But don't let the truth get in the way of your agendas.
So they double checked throught the audit trail in place. Wouldn't you?I beleive the said that afterwards once none was traced backed to RT
They certainly were not sure when the horse meat scandle started. That's a fact straight from the horses mouth !!
Yes but as we all know there audit trail is so flawed they were just lucky to not have any horse meat in a rt product.So they double checked throught the audit trail in place. Wouldn't you?
Yet with the dairy farm in Wales where they did act straight away and ceased his membership.
Dammed if they do, dammed if they don't.
But they did say at the time none was found in a RT product.
They also put full page adverts in all the main newspapers.
But don't let the truth get in the way of your agendas.
So it's all based on luck now .....OKYes but as we all know there audit trail is so flawed they were just lucky to not have any horse meat in a rt product.
so in reality they took the risk and got away with it.
This is true.
But that doesn't mean anything much necessarily
Sure Red Tractor meat didn't have horse in it. But did any meat labelled as British have horse in it? (I can't remember now). I don't think any butchers sold meat with horse in it. In fact did any UK fresh meat (ie stuff that looked recognisably meat in the packet) have horse in it?
All it means is that the meat that had horse in it was generally the lowest value (ie cheap crap) meat anyway and was in the processed food, Red Tractor doesn't mean one or the other. Sainsburys don't use Red Tractor, doesn't mean they sell their beef with horse does it?
Horsemeat scandal: Trial of firms accused of selling horse as beef opens in Paris
Millions of ready meals were withdrawn from sale after they were found to contain horse, not beef.www.bbc.co.uk
In fact how much prepared and frozen food is Red Tractor labelled anyway? I can't think of much. Its like the bread scenario - no bread is RT labelled and only one beer company use it.
Well they did yes, caught the same as all the retailers.Sainsburys don't use Red Tractor, doesn't mean they sell their beef with horse does it?
I've no idea on the British labelled part.
Given the horse meat came from Eastern europe in processed meats I would say not.
Issue is always with processed product's, cheap end of line.
No problem with eating horse, just label it as such.
Not sure what percentage of a product would have to be RT for it to be labelled as such.
Think I have seen product's labelled "made using RT beef/pork etc"
Well they did yes, caught the same as all the retailers.
Driven no doubt by the retailers pressure for "cheap" Beef.The way the horse scandal appears to have unfolded is some rogue traders chucked horse into the food system. It largely went into the cheapest of beef burgers and processed food. I don't think it got near anything that was expressly labelled as British, or much in the way of fresh meat and that of course it meant that vicariously it didn't get to RT labelled meat either - because RT meat must be British to be RT, and British meat doesn't use horse anyway.
RT jumped on this as evidence of their traceability system but in reality its because the British fresh meat trade didn't use horse anyway. In the same way Butchers didn't really have horse for sale either.
I'd be interested to see how many processed meals use the RT logo nowadays.
A product with a rt sticker on it should be 100% rtI've no idea on the British labelled part.
Given the horse meat came from Eastern europe in processed meats I would say not.
Issue is always with processed product's, cheap end of line.
No problem with eating horse, just label it as such.
Not sure what percentage of a product would have to be RT for it to be labelled as such.
Think I have seen product's labelled "made using RT beef/pork etc"
Driven no doubt by the retailers pressure for "cheap" Beef.
Maybe it was more difficult to use horse meat in UK processing facilities due to the audit trial being more strict on the back of RT? I don't know.
Don't eat processed meals so have no idea what so ever.
A product with a rt sticker on it should be 100% rt
if there sticker is going on stuff that isn’t 100% what’s the point? As the much vaunted traceability is null and void by default